The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization.

Adjacent speech, and even nonspeech, contexts influence phonetic categorization. Four experiments investigated how preceding sequences of sine-wave tones influence phonetic categorization. This experimental paradigm provides a means of investigating the statistical regularities of acoustic events that influence online speech categorization and, reciprocally, reveals regularities of the sound environment tracked by auditory processing. The tones comprising the sequences were drawn from distributions sampling different acoustic frequencies. Results indicate that whereas the mean of the distributions predicts contrastive shifts in speech categorization, variability of the distributions has little effect. Moreover, speech categorization is influenced by the global mean of the tone sequence, without significant influence of local statistical regularities within the tone sequence. Further arguing that the effect is strongly related to the average spectrum of the sequence, notched noise spectral complements of the tone sequences produce a complementary effect on speech categorization. Lastly, these effects are modulated by the number of tones in the acoustic history and the overall duration of the sequence, but not by the density with which the distribution defining the sequence is sampled. Results are discussed in light of stimulus-specific adaptation to statistical regularity in the acoustic input and a speculative link to talker normalization is postulated.

[1]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[2]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[3]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[4]  V. Mann Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  A. Saul,et al.  Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: The tuning of aftereffects in the spatial domain , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Saul,et al.  Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: The tuning of aftereffects in the temporal domain , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  David Kirby,et al.  Perceptual compensation for transmission channel and speaker effects on vowel quality , 1989, Speech Commun..

[9]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Speech Perception , 1990, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[10]  A. J. Watkins Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Habituation produces frequency-specific plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex. , 1991 .

[12]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Habituation produces frequency-specific plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  A. J. Watkins,et al.  Perceptual compensation for speaker differences and for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A. J. Watkins,et al.  Effects of spectral contrast on perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[17]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  Mechanical and "temporal" filtering as codeterminants of the response by cat primary fibers to amplitude-modulated signals. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Lotto,et al.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Time course of forward masking tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Macleod,et al.  Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors , 1997, Current Biology.

[21]  A. Lotto,et al.  General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  A. Lotto,et al.  Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[24]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.

[25]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. , 1999, Science.

[26]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[27]  V. Mann,et al.  Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  M. Sur,et al.  Adaptation-Induced Plasticity of Orientation Tuning in Adult Visual Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[29]  A. Lotto,et al.  Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation , 2000, Phonetica.

[31]  M. Carandini,et al.  Visual cortex: Fatigue and adaptation , 2000, Current Biology.

[32]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code , 2001, Nature.

[33]  I. Winkler,et al.  ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[35]  K. Kluender,et al.  Spectral tilt versus formant frequency in static and dynamic vowels , 2001 .

[36]  M. Semple,et al.  Effects of auditory stimulus context on the representation of frequency in the gerbil inferior colliculus. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[39]  Brian H Scott,et al.  Context-Dependent Adaptive Coding of Interaural Phase Disparity in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Macaques , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  A. Lotto,et al.  Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects , 2002, Hearing Research.

[41]  Sarah C. Sullivan,et al.  Central locus for nonspeech context effects on phonetic identification. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Joseph D. W. Stephens,et al.  Preceding phonetic context affects perception of nonspeech (L) , 2003 .

[43]  D. Gow Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Effects of contrast between onsets of speech and other complex spectra. , 2003, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Joseph D. W. Stephens,et al.  Preceding phonetic context affects perception of nonspeech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  R. Diehl,et al.  Speech Perception , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Thalamocortical transformation of responses to complex auditory stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  I. Nelken,et al.  Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  L. Holt Temporally Nonadjacent Nonlinguistic Sounds Affect Speech Categorization , 2005, Psychological science.

[51]  L. Holt,et al.  Incidental categorization of spectrally complex non-invariant auditory stimuli in a computer game task. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  L. Holt,et al.  Effects of later-occurring nonlinguistic sounds on speech categorization. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  L. Holt,et al.  Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  L. Holt Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  A. Lotto,et al.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: A commentary on Fowler (2006) , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  V. Csépe,et al.  The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.