Is a novel conceptual unit more than the sum of its parts?: FMRI evidence from an associative recognition memory study

Recollection, an effortful process relying on the integrity of a brain network including the hippocampus, is generally required to remember arbitrary associations whereas a simple familiarity signal arising in the perirhinal cortex is sufficient to recognize single items. However, the integration of separate items into a single configuration (unitization) leads to reduced involvement of recollection and greater reliance on familiarity. This seems to imply that unitized associations are processed similar to single items. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the effects of unitization as encoding strategy on retrieval processes in a between-group-design. A definition was provided that allows combining two unrelated words into a novel conceptual unit (e.g., milk taxi = a delivery service, which is directly dispatched from a farm). We compared this to an encoding strategy in which the words were studied as parts of a sentence. We included pairs in reversed order at test because reversing a unitized word pair is assumed to disrupt the unit while leaving item familiarity for the single constituents intact. This enabled us to compare recognition memory for novel units and single items. Sentence encoding led to a flexible recruitment of brain areas previously associated with recollection, irrespective of the order of the test pair. Unitization encoding reduced the involvement of the recollection network and specifically engaged regions within the parahippocampal cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex for novel units. In contrast, recognition of reversed pairs involved activation of BA 45 in the left inferior frontal gyrus. This possibly suggests that familiarity for novel units and single items are associated with different brain networks.

[1]  M. Sugishita,et al.  Anatomical constraints on visualization of the human hippocampus using echo-planar imaging , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[2]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect , 2007, NeuroImage.

[3]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Executive Control during Episodic Retrieval Multiple Prefrontal Processes Subserve Source Memory , 2002, Neuron.

[4]  R. Henson,et al.  A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? , 2003, Hippocampus.

[5]  Johan Hellman,et al.  Familiarity or Conceptual Priming: Event-related Potentials in Name Recognition , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  Heekyeong Park,et al.  The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  J. Ceraso,et al.  Unit Formation in Perception and Memory , 1985 .

[10]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Differential Encoding Mechanisms for Subsequent Associative Recognition and Free Recall , 2012 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Conjunction revisited , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  R. Henson,et al.  How schema and novelty augment memory formation , 2012, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Bertram Opitz,et al.  Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  D. Montaldi,et al.  The neural system that mediates familiarity memory , 2006, Hippocampus.

[17]  Analysis of FIAC data with BrainVoyager QX : From single subject to cortically aligned group GLM analysis , 2022 .

[18]  Regine Bader,et al.  More ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  E. Balteau,et al.  Differential effects of aging on the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2013, Cortex.

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Damage to the lateral prefrontal cortex impairs familiarity but not recollection , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. , 2009, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[23]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[24]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new , 1989 .

[25]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Schnyer,et al.  A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: Evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition , 2004, Hippocampus.

[28]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[29]  Rachel A. Diana,et al.  Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Episodic memory storage and retrieval: Insights from electrophysiological measures , 2007 .

[31]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Functional significance of retrieval‐related activity in lateral parietal cortex: Evidence from fMRI and ERPs , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Bertram Opitz,et al.  Neural binding mechanisms in learning and memory , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  K. Norman,et al.  Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia , 2007, Hippocampus.

[34]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Interplay of Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory , 2013, Current Biology.

[35]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Item Associations Doubly Dissociate the Electrophysiological Correlates of Familiarity and Recollection , 2006, Neuron.

[36]  D. Schacter,et al.  Medial temporal lobe activations in fMRI and PET studies of episodic encoding and retrieval , 1999, Hippocampus.

[37]  A. Yonelinas,et al.  Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions , 2010, Hippocampus.

[38]  K. Henke A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Kelly S. Giovanello,et al.  Neural correlates of familiarity-based associative retrieval , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. , 1997, Science.

[42]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  N. Hunkin,et al.  Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order of different kinds in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[44]  M. Verfaellie,et al.  The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  L. Davachi,et al.  Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: insights from relational and item-based learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Perirhinal Cortex Supports Encoding and Familiarity-Based Recognition of Novel Associations , 2008, Neuron.

[48]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Further Dissociating the Processes Involved in Recognition Memory: An fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[51]  Patric Meyer,et al.  Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2010, NeuroImage.

[52]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[54]  John P. Aggleton,et al.  Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. , 2003, Psychological review.

[56]  Regine Bader,et al.  Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: An electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory , 2010, Brain Research.

[57]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[58]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Two effects of repetition: Support for a dual-process model of know judgments and exclusion errors , 1998 .

[59]  Regine Bader,et al.  The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400 , 2012, NeuroImage.

[60]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Episodic Encoding Is More than the Sum of Its Parts: An fMRI Investigation of Multifeatural Contextual Encoding , 2006, Neuron.

[61]  C. Ranganath A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory , 2010, Hippocampus.

[62]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Functional heterogeneity in posterior parietal cortex across attention and episodic memory retrieval. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  M. Kahana Associative symmetry and memory theory , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[64]  Mieke Verfaellie,et al.  Distinct hippocampal regions make unique contributions to relational memory , 2009, Hippocampus.

[65]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Abnormal neural filtering of irrelevant visual information in depression , 2009, NeuroImage.

[66]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  On the Processing of Semantic Aspects of Experience in the Anterior Medial Temporal Lobe: An Event-related fMRI Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Recognition memory for single items and for associations in amnesic patients , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[69]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[70]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.