Cross-language similarity and difference in quantity categorization of Finnish and Japanese

Abstract The present study investigates how listeners of Finnish and Japanese, languages with very similar contrasts in plosive quantity (short vs. long), use language-specific phonetic knowledge of acoustic attributes which covary with closure duration. A fully-crossed perceptual experiment on consonant quantity categorization was conducted with 22 Finnish and 20 Japanese listeners, using natural speech stimuli with systematically manipulated closure durations. Stimuli were created from Finnish and Japanese productions of both long and short plosives. In the naturally produced stimuli, the duration of the vowel preceding the target consonant was affected by language-specific word prosody patterns. The results showed an across-the-board effect of the original quantity of the produced stimulus, with the stimuli created from words with a geminate consonant tending to be perceived as geminate, irrespective of the language of the listeners or talkers, suggesting a strong influence of cues besides closure duration that are shared by the two languages. However, Japanese listeners were more heavily affected by the acoustic cues concomitant to the quantity contrast in their native language, likely due to robust language-specific vowel duration effects in the Japanese productions. Word prosody, besides creating subtle shifts in category boundary for both language groups, created confusions in the listener responses, especially when the language-specific word-level prosodic effect is localized in the vowel preceding the target word, and when the listener is confronted with stimuli from the other language. Thus, some aspects of the quantity contrast are remarkably similar between the two languages, and listeners from one language group are attuned to attributes found in the other language. However, other attributes appear to be language specific, and such durational differences may interfere with categorization in an unfamiliar language.

[1]  J. Kruschke Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Phonetic tone signals phonological quantity and word structure. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Toshiko Isei-Jaakkola Durational Variability of Vowel Quantity Boundary for Japanese , Finnish and Czech Speakers in Perception , 2009 .

[5]  Martti Vainio,et al.  Real-Time Correlates of Phonological Quantity Reveal Unity of Tonal and Non-Tonal Languages , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Dale Terbeek WPP, No. 37: A Cross-language Multidimensional Scaling Study of Vowel Perception , 1977 .

[7]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[8]  Katsura Aoyama A Psycholinguistic Perspective on Finnish and Japanese Prosody , 2001 .

[9]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Durational and tonal correlates of accent in Finnish , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[11]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of Speaking Rate on the Singleton/Geminate Consonant Contrast in Italian , 1999, Phonetica.

[12]  Nick Campbell A Study of Japanese Speech Timing from the Syllable Perspective( Contrasting English and Japanese Phonetics) , 1999 .

[13]  Kaori Idemaru,et al.  Relational Timing in the Production and Perception of Japanese Singleton and Geminate Stops , 2010, Phonetica.

[14]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Effects of initial position versus prominence in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[15]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Cross‐Language Differences in the Perception of Natural Vowel Sounds , 1971 .

[16]  Scott Myers,et al.  The origin of vowel-length neutralisation in vocoid sequences: evidence from Finnish speakers , 2005, Phonology.

[17]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jonas N. Akpanglo. Nartey On fricative phones and phonemes : measuring the phonetic difference within and between languages , 1982 .

[19]  R. Port,et al.  Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Heikki Lyytinen,et al.  Speech Perception of Infants With High Familial Risk for Dyslexia Differ at the Age of 6 Months , 2003, Developmental neuropsychology.

[21]  R. Krakow Physiological organization of syllables: a review , 1999 .

[22]  Shigeaki Amano,et al.  Phonotactics in the perception of Japanese vowel length: evidence for long-distance dependencies , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[23]  Michael O´Dell,et al.  Intrinsic Timing and Quantity in Finnish , 2003 .

[24]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[25]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  A cross‐language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing , 1981 .

[26]  Yukari Hirata,et al.  Correspondence of perception and production boundaries between single and geminate stops in Japanese , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[27]  Yasuka Nagano-Madsen Mora and Prosodic Coordination: A Phonetic Study of Japanese, Eskimo and Yoruba , 1992 .

[28]  Paola Escudero,et al.  The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[29]  Kaori Idemaru,et al.  Singleton and geminate stops in Finnish - acoustic correlates , 2007, INTERSPEECH.

[30]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[31]  John Kingston,et al.  Phonetic Knowledge , 2015 .

[32]  R. Plomp,et al.  Perceptual and physical space of vowel sounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  William Hallett Ham,et al.  Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Geminate Timing , 2001 .

[34]  John Kingston,et al.  Contextual effects on the perception of duration , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[35]  S. F. Disner Vowel quality : the relation between universal and language specific factors , 1983 .

[36]  E. Zurif,et al.  The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: the case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Katerina Nicolaidis International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 2011, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[38]  Kari Suomi,et al.  On the tonal and temporal domains of accent in Finnish , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[39]  Kari Suomi Temporal conspiracies for a tonal end: Segmental durations and accentual f0 movement in a quantity language , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[40]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[41]  J. Kruschke Doing Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[42]  C A Fowler,et al.  Declination of Supralaryngeal Gestures in Spoken Italian , 1992, Phonetica.

[43]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[44]  Ian Maddieson Palato‐alveolar affricates in several languages , 1979 .

[45]  J. Lehtonen Aspects of quantity in standard Finnish , 1970 .

[46]  J. Kruschke Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS , 2010 .

[47]  J. Kruschke What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[49]  Yukari Hirata,et al.  Effects of speaking rate on the single/geminate stop distinction in Japanese. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  Kaori Idemaru,et al.  Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops , 2008, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[51]  M. Beckman Stress And Non-Stress Accent , 1986 .

[52]  Martti Vainio,et al.  Perception of vowel length: Tonality cues categorization even in a quantity language , 2007 .