NSIC Rc222-derived Mutants Characterized for Field Performance Identifying Putative Complete Submergence Tolerant Lines

In the 2019 dry season (DS) 18 genotypes – comprised of 13 mutant lines derived from seed mutation of NSIC Rc222, four check varieties, and one wildtype – were evaluated for field performance under submergence stress (STR) and non-stress irrigated (NSTR) condition in comparison to checks and wildtype to determine the effect of submergence to agronomic traits, grain yield, and yield components. Submergence was imposed at 21 d after transplanting (DAT) and lasted for 8 d. Survival of the mutant lines was comparable to the tolerant check FR13A, IR64-Sub1, and PSB Rc68, as well as to the wildtype NSIC Rc222. Variance component analysis showed that variation observed among the genotypes for all traits evaluated was due to the growing condition. Significant effect of submergence stress on agronomic traits, grain yield, and yield components was observed, with seven mutant lines yielding significantly higher than the checks and wildtype under stress. Promising stress-tolerant mutant lines – with comparable performance under NSTR and superior performance under STR to the checks and wildtype – were identified, viz. Sub 100, 101, 104, 105, and 110. These mutant lines can serve as possible donors of genes for tolerance to submergence stress or can be developed directly as varieties for registration and release for commercial cultivation.

[1]  R. Bernardo Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE , 2020, Heredity.

[2]  S. Chukwu,et al.  Submergence Tolerance in Rice: Review of Mechanism, Breeding and, Future Prospects , 2020 .

[3]  J. Hunt,et al.  Evaluation of G × E × M Interactions to Increase Harvest Index and Yield of Early Sown Wheat , 2018, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[4]  N. Khumaida,et al.  Screening of Submergence Tolerant Rice under Artificial Condition Based on Multiple Selection Indices , 2019 .

[5]  R. Deshmukh,et al.  Mutagenesis Approaches and Their Role in Crop Improvement , 2019, Plants.

[6]  M. Karim,et al.  Evaluation of Submergence Tolerance in Landrace Rice Cultivars by Various Growth and Yield Parameters , 2019, Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology.

[7]  M. Islam,et al.  Responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to different levels of submergence. , 2018, Comptes rendus biologies.

[8]  N. H. Nguyen,et al.  Effects of Genotype by Environment Interaction on Genetic Gain and Genetic Parameter Estimates in Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) , 2017, Front. Genet..

[9]  L. Voesenek,et al.  Flood adaptive traits and processes: an overview. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[10]  A. Ismail,et al.  Physiological basis of tolerance to complete submergence in rice involves genetic factors in addition to the SUB1 gene , 2014, AoB PLANTS.

[11]  M. Esguerra,et al.  Variation in tolerance of rice to long-term stagnant flooding that submerges most of the shoot will aid in breeding tolerant cultivars , 2014, AoB PLANTS.

[12]  A. Ismail,et al.  RESPONSE OF SUB1 INTROGRESSION LINES OF RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS , 2013 .

[13]  R. K. Singh,et al.  Field performance, dissemination, impact and tracking of submergence tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties in South Asia. , 2013 .

[14]  J. Bailey-Serres,et al.  Differential metabolic regulation governed by the rice SUB1A gene during submergence stress and identification of alanylglycine by 1H NMR spectroscopy. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  M. Nakazono,et al.  Mechanisms for coping with submergence and waterlogging in rice , 2012, Rice.

[16]  S. Rounds,et al.  Controls on biochemical oxygen demand in the upper Klamath River, Oregon , 2010 .

[17]  H. Kato‐Noguchi Submergence Acclimation to Low-Temperature Stress in Rice Roots , 2007 .

[18]  M. D. Reddy,et al.  Effect of complete plant submergence at different growth stages on grain yield, yield components and nutrient content of rice , 1985, Plant and Soil.

[19]  K. Trijatmiko Comparative analysis of drought resistance genes in Arabidopsis and rice , 2004 .

[20]  E. Fridman,et al.  Functional Divergence of a Syntenic Invertase Gene Family in Tomato, Potato, and Arabidopsis1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[21]  H. Rolletschek,et al.  Antisense-inhibition of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in developing seeds of Vicia narbonensis moderately decreases starch but increases protein content and affects seed maturation. , 2000, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[22]  S. Nomura,et al.  Effects of air supply on the growth of tiller buds in floating rice. , 1990 .

[23]  D. Peterson,et al.  Growth characteristics, grain filling, and assimilate transport in a shrunken endosperm mutant of barley. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[24]  A. Tanaka,et al.  Growth habit of the rice plant in the tropics and its effect on nitrogen response , 1964 .

[25]  C. H. Mortimer,et al.  Oxidation-Reduction Potentials in Waterlogged Soils, Natural Waters and Muds , 1939 .