A research pilot project to test the efficacy of current pedorthic practices in the Canadian Forces.

Impact loading is a major factor in the high prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries among military personnel during operational tasks. One of the therapeutic purposes of a pedorthic approach is to attenuate impact load through footwear and supportive device cushioning. The following research pilot project attempts to investigate this relationship. Vertical acceleration was collected at the fourth lumbar level in 30 members of the Canadian Forces (CF) during two ladder descents on a CF warship. Body weight, time of descent, and a description of footwear and any additional supportive appliances were also collected. None of the evaluated variables were significantly different between members wearing standard issue footwear and medically prescribed footwear and supportive devices. Although the results of this research pilot must be viewed with caution, the preliminary findings of this pilot tends to suggest that the current pedorthic practices may not effectively reduce peak impact forces at the fourth lumbar level of the spine among CF personnel during a selected naval activity.

[1]  A Burdorf,et al.  Physical load in ship maintenance: hazard evaluation by means of a workplace survey. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  D. I. Miller,et al.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Prevention of stress fractures using custom biomechanical shoe orthoses. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  B M Nigg,et al.  Relationship between footwear comfort of shoe inserts and anthropometric and sensory factors. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  S P Baker,et al.  At work and play in a hazardous environment: injuries aboard a deployed U.S. Navy aircraft carrier. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  B M Nigg,et al.  Current Issues in the Design of Running and Court Shoes , 2000, Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft fur Orthopadisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin.

[8]  A Simkin,et al.  A Prospective Study of the Effect of a Shock-Absorbing Orthotic Device on the Incidence of Stress Fractures in Military Recruits , 1985, Foot & ankle.

[9]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke.  Designing footwear: back to basics in an effort to design for people , 2003 .

[10]  Bruce H. Jones,et al.  Atlas of Injuries in the U.S. Armed Forces: A Report by the DOD Injury Surveillance and Prevention Work Group for the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Safety and Occupational Health , 1999 .

[11]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[12]  C. K. Cheng,et al.  Biomechanical analysis in ladder climbing: the effect of slant angle and climbing speed. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life sciences.

[13]  C. Leboeuf‐Yde,et al.  Can custom-made biomechanic shoe orthoses prevent problems in the back and lower extremities? A randomized, controlled intervention trial of 146 military conscripts. , 2002, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[14]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Evaluation of shock attenuation in the forelimb of horses wearing boots and wraps , 2000 .

[15]  P J McNair,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic parameters associated with running in different shoes. , 1994, British journal of sports medicine.

[16]  C. Milgrom,et al.  The Role of Biomechanical Shoe Orthoses in Tibial Stress Fracture Prevention , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  S J Dixon,et al.  The shock attenuation characteristics of four different insoles when worn in a military boot during running and marching. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[18]  G. J. Gouw,et al.  Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Atlas of injuries in the United States Armed Forces. , 1999, Military medicine.

[20]  R Kadefors,et al.  Working on a moving surface--a biomechanical analysis of musculo-skeletal load due to ship motions in combination with work. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[21]  Ewald M. Hennig,et al.  Biomechanical Variables and the Perception of Cushioning for Running in Various Types of Footwear , 1996 .

[22]  Benno M Nigg,et al.  Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics, and EMG in recreational runners. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Footwear affects the behavior of low back muscles when jogging. , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.

[24]  G. Havenith,et al.  Human energy expenditure when walking on a moving platform , 1998, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[25]  Z Zong,et al.  Biodynamic response of shipboard sitting subject to ship shock motion. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.