Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing

The ability to follow new instructions is crucial for acquiring behaviors and the cultural transmission of performance-related knowledge. In this article, we discuss the observation that successful instruction following seems to require both the capacity to understand verbal information, but also the ability to transform this information into a procedural format. Here we review the behavioral and neuroimaging literature on following new instructions and discuss how it contributes to our understanding of the functional mechanisms underlying instruction following. Based on this review, we distinguish three phases of instruction following. In the instruction phase, the declarative information of the task instruction is transformed into a task model consisting of a structured representation of the relevant condition-action rules. In the implementation phase, elements of this task model are transformed into a highly accessible state guiding behavior. In the application phase, the relevant condition-action rules are applied. We discuss the boundary conditions and capacity limits of these phases, determine their neural correlates, and relate them to recent models of working memory.

[1]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus-response translation. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  P. Zelazo,et al.  An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them ☆ , 1996 .

[4]  J. Houwer,et al.  Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  M Eimer,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[7]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Rapid Transfer of Abstract Rules to Novel Contexts in Human Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  John Duncan,et al.  Goal neglect and knowledge chunking in the construction of novel behaviour☆ , 2014, Cognition.

[10]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  John Duncan,et al.  Assembly and Use of New Task Rules in Fronto-parietal Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  C. Lewis,et al.  When knowledge is not enough: the phenomenon of goal neglect in preschool children. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[16]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  Age‐related Asynchrony of Knowledge and Action , 1991 .

[17]  Trenton E. Kriete,et al.  Generalisation benefits of output gating in a model of prefrontal cortex , 2011, Connect. Sci..

[18]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[19]  Marcel Brass,et al.  There is more into ‘doing’ than ‘knowing’: The function of the right inferior frontal sulcus is specific for implementing versus memorising verbal instructions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[20]  Christopher H. Chatham,et al.  Corticostriatal Output Gating during Selection from Working Memory , 2014, Neuron.

[21]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Grounding cognitive control in associative learning. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Kane,et al.  Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[25]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[26]  E Berendsen,et al.  Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[27]  M. Kane,et al.  GOAL NEGLECT AND WORKING MEMORY IN PRESS CHILD DEVELOPMENT Goal Neglect and Working Memory Capacity in 4to 6-Year-Old Children , 2009 .

[28]  Mike Anderson,et al.  Task structure complexity and goal neglect in typically developing children. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  Daniel J Mitchell,et al.  Neural Coding for Instruction‐Based Task Sets in Human Frontoparietal and Visual Cortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  David Badre,et al.  Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro–caudal organization of the frontal lobes , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  M. Steinhauser,et al.  Automatic activation of task-related representations in task shifting , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[32]  H. Munk Zur Physiologie der Grosshirnrinde , 1902 .

[33]  Andreas Roepstorff,et al.  What’s at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and ‘top-top’ control of action in cognitive experiments , 2004, Psychological research.

[34]  Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings , 2014, Psychological research.

[35]  Adele Diamond,et al.  Frontal lobe involvement in cognitive changes during the first year of life. , 1991 .

[36]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Baptist Liefooghe,et al.  Automatic motor activation by mere instruction , 2014, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[39]  Klus Oberauer,et al.  Declarative and Procedural Working Memory: Common Principles, Common Capacity Limits? , 2010 .

[40]  M. Brass,et al.  It wasn’t me! Motor activation from irrelevant spatial information in the absence of a response , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and binding in sentence recall , 2009 .

[42]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[43]  P. Zelazo The development of conscious control in childhood , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  B. Hommel The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation , 2000 .

[45]  Word and deed: a computational model of instruction following , 2011 .

[46]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[47]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus–response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials , 2015, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The implementation of verbal instructions: Dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus–response associations , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  M. Brass,et al.  The implementation of verbal instructions: An fMRI study , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Stefaan Vandorpe,et al.  Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Ideomotor apraxia: A review , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[52]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  When planning results in loss of control: intention-based reflexivity and working-memory , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Neural Correlates of Overcoming Interference from Instructed and Implemented Stimulus–Response Associations , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Prefrontal Dynamics Underlying Rapid Instructed Task Learning Reverse with Practice , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  M. Brass,et al.  There Are Limits to the Effects of Task Instructions: Making the Automatic Effects of Task Instructions Context-Specific Takes Practice , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  The Relationship between Working Memory Storage and Elevated Activity as Measured with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  A. Vandierendonck A Working Memory System With Distributed Executive Control , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[58]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[60]  B. Milner Effects of Different Brain Lesions on Card Sorting: The Role of the Frontal Lobes , 1963 .

[61]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Design for a working memory. , 2009 .

[62]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  John Duncan,et al.  Goal neglect and Spearman's g: competing parts of a complex task. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  A. Whiten,et al.  Cultures in chimpanzees , 1999, Nature.

[65]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Functional MRI of Macaque Monkeys Performing a Cognitive Set-Shifting Task , 2002, Science.