Evaluation of Triple Bottom Line Impacts of Resourceful Communities' Creating New Economies Fund

Resourceful Communities is a program of The Conservation Fund, a national nonprofit that promotes conservation and sustainable economic development. In 2001, Resourceful Communities established the Creating New Economies Fund (CNEF), a program to support triple bottom line community development work in North Carolina. The triple bottom line approach integrates sustainable economic development, environmental stewardship, and social justice to create solutions to challenges facing communities in North Carolina. Each year, CNEF awards small grants to partner organizations to develop and implement community-driven triple bottom line projects. Resourceful Communities has experienced difficulty in communicating the aggregate impacts of the partner projects that they support, which may be a result of inadequate reporting and evaluation tools, and is also confounded by the wide variety of projects they support. Resourceful Communities has requested that our team conduct a thorough evaluation of CNEF that will be used to clearly communicate their impacts, as well as provide recommendations to guide CNEF in improving the program and its reporting processes. We evaluated the impacts of the most recent three years of projects (2009-2011) supported by CNEF using a mixed-method approach, including surveys, interviews, site visits, and review of reports submitted by CNEF grantees. We distributed an online survey to grantee project leaders designed to gather information on the triple bottom line impacts of the projects. We conducted nine interviews with grantee project staff to better understand project impacts and gather grantees’ opinions on how CNEF could be improved. We performed three site visits to talk with project staff in person and to see some of the on-the-ground work being done by grantees. Finally, we reviewed all final reports submitted by the grantees to CNEF in order to gain information on projects that were not included in the survey or interviews. We used NVivo 10 qualitative analysis software to analyze qualitative data, and we used STATA and Excel to perform statistical analysis on quantitative data. We found that CNEF supported projects are contributing to triple bottom line sustainability in North Carolina in significant and widely varied ways. Further, we found the CNEF program fosters integration of the three components of the triple bottom line, community engagement, leveraged funding, and increased organizational capacity in the projects it supports. Based on our findings we were able to offer several recommendations to Resourceful Communities that might improve the CNEF program and its reporting practices.

[1]  Frans L. Leeuw,et al.  Impact evaluations and development : NONIE guidance on impact evaluation , 2009 .

[2]  J. Elkington.  Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[3]  John Brohman,et al.  Popular Development: Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Development , 1996 .

[4]  A. Barton,et al.  Incorporating social justice in tourism planning: racial reconciliation and sustainable community development in the Deep South , 2010, 50 Years of Community Development Vol II.

[5]  G. O’Brien,et al.  Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development , 2002 .

[6]  S. Withers,et al.  Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Which to Choose? , 2014 .

[7]  Michael Parks,et al.  What Do Healthy Rural Economies Look Like in the U.S., and How Might Conservation Organizations Help Support Them? , 2013 .

[8]  Pamela Stricker,et al.  Bringing social justice back in: Cuba revitalises sustainable development. , 2010 .

[9]  M. Roseland.  Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives , 2000 .

[10]  B. Gentry,et al.  Strategies for the Future of Conservation , 2007 .

[11]  Timothy F. Slaper,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? , 2011 .

[12]  Alistair R. Anderson.  Cultivating the Garden of Eden: environmental entrepreneuring , 1998 .

[13]  Peter Glavič,et al.  A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development , 2005 .

[14]  E. Cowen.  Some problems in community program evaluation research. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  A. Mathie,et al.  From clients to citizens: Asset-based Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development , 2003 .

[16]  M. Lehtonen,et al.  The environmental-social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions , 2004 .

[17]  Andrew Savitz,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success -- and How You Can Too , 2006 .

[18]  John P. Kretzman,et al.  Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets , 1993 .

[19]  S. Dixon,et al.  Ecopreneurship – a new approach to managing the triple bottom line , 2007 .

[20]  Roberta Ryan,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line for Sustainable Community Development , 2001 .

[21]  Lorna Earl,et al.  The Case for Participatory Evaluation , 1992 .

[22]  R. Fisher.  Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[23]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our Common Future (‘The Brundtland Report’): World Commission on Environment and Development , 2009 .