From Form-Based to Performance-Based Codes

The performance of the built environment is an important concern affecting the quality of life and plays a critical role in every urban milieu. However, it generally disappears in the drawing plans. Current planning regulations do not always include performance requirements as part of the planning demands. Additionally, decision-makers lack the methodology and tools to demonstrate the expected performance of the built environment. Therefore, an examination of the performance of the designed area is sometimes neglected in the planning process. Current urban plans focus mainly on technical issues, counting the number of residential units, density measures, etc. The trend of progressive planning regulations, such as Form-Based Code (FBC), aims to coordinate these separated quantitative parameters into one comprehensive 3D plan where the urban form plays as a main integrator. However, these plans still lack the demand for understanding the quality and performance of the built environment through the visualization. This article addresses this gap, the lack of understanding of the performance of the built environment in urban plans and proposes the concept of Performance-Based Codes (PBC). The transition from form-based code to performance-based-design will be demonstrated through the presentation of two performance-based models, the Solar Envelope and Security Rating Index, and the possibility of integrating them into the planning process.

[1]  Isaac G. Capeluto,et al.  Assessing the green potential of existing buildings towards smart cities and districts , 2016 .

[2]  Vikas Mehta,et al.  Evaluating Public Space , 2014, Public Space Reader.

[3]  J. Sallis,et al.  Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Betty Pfefferbaum,et al.  The Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART): an intervention to build community resilience to disasters. , 2013, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[5]  I. Delsante Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa , 2016 .

[6]  Dalit Shach-Pinsly,et al.  Measuring security in the built environment: Evaluating urban vulnerability in a human-scale urban form , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[7]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  The Place-shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process , 2014 .

[8]  Daniel E. Orenstein,et al.  A Comparative Framework for Assessing Sustainability Initiatives at the Regional Scale , 2017 .

[9]  Ralph Evins,et al.  A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design , 2013 .

[10]  James Marwedel Opting for Performance: An Alternative to Conventional Zoning for Land Use Regulation , 1998 .

[11]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  A method for the generation of climate-based, context-dependent parametric solar envelopes , 2017 .

[12]  Leora Waldner,et al.  Planning To Perform: Evaluation Models For City Planners , 2011 .

[13]  Edna Shaviv,et al.  Climatic aspects in urban design—a case study , 2003 .

[14]  Dejan Dragan,et al.  The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process , 2019 .

[15]  Edna Shaviv,et al.  On the use of ‘solar volume’ for determining the urban fabric , 2001 .

[16]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes , 2018, Journal of Urban Design.

[17]  Teemu Tiainen,et al.  Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[18]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  Advice tool for early design stages of intelligent facades based on energy and visual comfort approach , 2009 .

[19]  E. Talen Design by the Rules: The Historical Underpinnings of Form-Based Codes , 2009 .

[20]  Emily Talen,et al.  After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans , 1996 .

[21]  William C. Baer,et al.  General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans , 1997 .

[22]  P. Healey Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[23]  Juval Portugali,et al.  Planning rules for a self-planned city , 2007 .

[24]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  Non-Linear Architectural Design Process , 2010 .

[25]  Dalit Shach‐Pinsly Visual openness and visual exposure analysis models used as evaluation tools during the urban design development process , 2010 .

[26]  Isaac Guedi Capeluto,et al.  Computer-Based Form Generation in Architectural Design — A Critical Review , 2009 .

[27]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Developing a sustainability assessment model : the sustainable infrastructure, land-use, environment and transport model , 2010 .

[28]  Brendan Gleeson,et al.  Performance-Based Planning , 2006 .

[29]  Vítor Oliveira,et al.  Evaluation in Urban Planning: Advances and Prospects , 2010 .

[30]  Kayvan Karimi,et al.  A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology , 2012 .

[31]  Susie R. Wu,et al.  Incorporating Culture Into Sustainable Development: A Cultural Sustainability Index Framework for Green Buildings , 2016 .

[32]  Guedi Capeluto,et al.  Dense Cities in Temperate Climates: Solar and Daylight Rights , 2013 .

[33]  J. M. Oakes,et al.  Cycling, the Built Environment, and Health: Results of a Midwestern Study , 2015 .

[34]  Neema S. Sumari,et al.  A Geospatial Approach to Sustainable Urban Planning: Lessons for Morogoro Municipal Council, Tanzania , 2019 .

[35]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Rethinking sustainable urban development: towards an integrated planning and development process , 2014, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[36]  Yehuda E. Kalay,et al.  Performance-based design , 1999 .

[37]  Gerhard Schmitt,et al.  Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design , 2018 .

[38]  Isaac Guedi Capeluto The influence of the urban environment on the availability of daylighting in office buildings in Israel , 2003 .

[39]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Sustainable urban development: A review on urban carrying capacity assessment , 2015 .

[40]  Nektarios Chrysoulakis,et al.  A Decision-Support System for Sustainable Urban Metabolism in Europe , 2013 .

[41]  Michael W. Mehaffy Generative methods in urban design: a progress assessment , 2008 .

[42]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[43]  Sha Liu,et al.  Building information modeling based building design optimization for sustainability , 2015 .

[44]  John Burnett,et al.  Benchmarking energy use assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and LEED , 2008 .

[45]  Monjur Mourshed,et al.  A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design , 2015 .

[46]  Carrie L. Mitchell,et al.  Just urban futures? Exploring equity in “100 Resilient Cities” , 2019, World Development.

[47]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools , 2013 .

[48]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  City planning and population health: a global challenge , 2016, The Lancet.