Visual policy narrative messaging improves COVID-19 vaccine uptake

Abstract In the face of vaccine hesitancy, public health officials are seeking more effective risk communication approaches to increase vaccination rates. We test the influence of visual policy narratives on COVID-19 vaccination behavior through a panel survey experiment conducted in early 2021 (n = 3,900) and then 8 weeks later (n = 2,268). We examine the effects of three visual policy narrative messages that test the narrative mechanism of character selection (yourself, your circle, and your community) and a nonnarrative control on COVID-19 vaccine behavior. Visual risk messages that use narratives positively influence COVID-19 vaccination through serial mediation of affective response to the messages and motivation to get the COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, character selection matters, as messages focusing on protecting others (i.e. your circle and your community) perform stronger than those of yourself. Political ideology moderated some of the effects, with conservative respondents in the nonnarrative control condition having a higher probability of vaccination in comparison to the protect yourself condition. Taken together, these results suggest that public health officials should use narrative-based visual communication messages that emphasize communal benefits of vaccinations.

[1]  Jack Hennes.  Communicating in Risk, Crisis, and High Stress Situations: Evidence-Based Strategies and Practice: Vincent T. Covello: [Book Review] , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[2]  M. Ranney,et al.  Public communication about public health where we really need to go , 2022, npj Digital Medicine.

[3]  V. Covello.  Communicating in Risk, Crisis, and High Stress Situations , 2021 .

[4]  Eric D. Raile,et al.  Narrative Risk Communication as a Lingua Franca for Environmental Hazard Preparation , 2021, Environmental Communication.

[5]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Polarization Over Vaccination: Ideological Differences in Twitter Expression About COVID-19 Vaccine Favorability and Specific Hesitancy Concerns , 2021, Social Media + Society.

[6]  L. Pirofski,et al.  Understanding vaccine hesitancy in COVID-19 , 2021, Med.

[7]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Needlestick Injuries Among Healthcare Workers Administering COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States , 2021, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[8]  A. Gesser-Edelsburg.  Using Narrative Evidence to Convey Health Information on Social Media: The Case of COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Roderik Rekker.  The nature and origins of political polarization over science , 2021, Public understanding of science.

[10]  Elizabeth A. Shanahan,et al.  Communicating risk in human-wildlife interactions: How stories and images move minds , 2020, PloS one.

[11]  P. Hotez,et al.  Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 , 2020, Social Science & Medicine.

[12]  J. Besley,et al.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Matthew Motta,et al.  Encouraging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Through Effective Health Communication , 2020, Frontiers in Political Science.

[14]  Matthew Motta,et al.  Can a COVID-19 vaccine live up to Americans’ expectations? A conjoint analysis of how vaccine characteristics influence vaccination intentions , 2020, Social Science & Medicine.

[15]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions , 2020, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[16]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world , 2020, Journal of Risk Research.

[17]  D. Vallone,et al.  Boosting Health Campaign Reach and Engagement Through Use of Social Media Influencers and Memes , 2020, Social Media + Society.

[18]  S. Feldman,et al.  The Interplay of Empathy and Individualism in Support for Social Welfare Policies , 2019, Political Psychology.

[19]  Aaron Smith-Walter,et al.  The stories groups tell: campaign finance reform and the narrative networks of cultural cognition , 2020, Quality & Quantity.

[20]  Eric D. Raile,et al.  Characters matter: How narratives shape affective responses to risk communication , 2019, PloS one.

[21]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Liberal and Conservative Values: What We Can Learn From Congressional Tweets , 2018 .

[22]  Mark A. Largent,et al.  A survey instrument for measuring vaccine acceptance. , 2018, Preventive medicine.

[23]  Robert L Heath,et al.  Risk Communication Emergency Response Preparedness: Contextual Assessment of the Protective Action Decision Model , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Katharine A. Rendle,et al.  The Importance Of Integrating Narrative Into Health Care Decision Making. , 2016, Health affairs.

[25]  C. Shealy.  Making Sense of Beliefs and Values: Theory, Research, and Practice , 2015 .

[26]  E. Carmines,et al.  The New Look in Political Ideology Research , 2015 .

[27]  Dallas J. Elgin.  The Effects of Risk, Knowledge, and Ideological Beliefs on Climate Policy Preferences: A Study of Colorado Climate and Energy Policy Actors , 2014 .

[28]  Michael D. Jones.  Cultural Characters and Climate Change: How Heroes Shape Our Perception of Climate Science† , 2014 .

[29]  D. Scheufele,et al.  The science of science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  The sciences of science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  M. McBeth,et al.  An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities , 2013 .

[32]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[33]  H. de Vries,et al.  The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk. , 2013, British journal of health psychology.

[34]  W. Botzen,et al.  Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam , 2012 .

[35]  Antonio Chirumbolo,et al.  Are Conservatives Less Likely to be Prosocial than Liberals? From Games to Ideology, Political Preferences and Votingg , 2012 .

[36]  D. Kahan,et al.  Cultural cognition of scientific consensus , 2011 .

[37]  C. Tufanaru,et al.  Health Belief Model , 2009 .

[38]  V. Covello.  Strategies for Overcoming Challenges to Effective Risk Communication , 2008, Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication.

[39]  Noel T Brewer,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[40]  P. Converse.  The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964) , 2006, The Nature of Belief Systems Reconsidered.

[41]  D. Kahan,et al.  Cultural Cognition and Public Policy , 2005 .

[42]  H. Markel,et al.  The history of vaccines and immunization: familiar patterns, new challenges. , 2005, Health affairs.

[43]  P. Converse.  The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[44]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. , 2003 .

[45]  N Krieger,et al.  Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[46]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[48]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[49]  Andrea L. Taylor,et al.  Public perception of climate risk and adaptation in the UK: A review of the literature , 2014 .

[50]  M. McBeth,et al.  The narrative policy framework , 2014 .

[51]  James Shanteau,et al.  Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research , 2003 .