Confronting dynamics misconceptions

This paper starts from the assumption that leaming is promoted through confronting students with the inconsistencies entailed by their own beliefs. The issue is explored in the domain of Newtonian dynamics in the context of one or more moving particles. Previous work is used as the basis for the construction of a programme of work that is undertaken by a group of students. This programme entailed the development of a computer-based modelling environment called DYNLAB. The underlying design principle is that students should be able to model the agencies involved at a level which permits them to express some of their explicit (possibly mistaken) beliefs about relevant concepts. Other, implicit, beliefs should also be detectable through use of the system. The results derived from observation suggest that computer-based modelling facilities can provide advantages over approaches exploiting other media. In particular, such systems can be used to promote the kinds of intellectual conflict that are believed to be beneficial.

[1]  K. R. Johnson,et al.  TEACHING MATHEMATICS THROUGH PROGRAMMING IN THE CLASSROOM , 1982 .

[2]  Paul Brna.  Confronting science misconceptions with the help of a computer. , 1987 .

[3]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects , 1981, Cognition.

[4]  L. Viennot.  Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .

[5]  F. Wilkening.  Integrating velocity, time, and distance information: A developmental study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Jon Ogborn.  Understanding students’ understandings: An example from dynamics , 1985 .

[7]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[8]  A. Franklin.  Galileo and the leaning tower: an Aristotelian interpretation , 1979 .

[9]  Ronald J. Raven.  The development of the concept of acceleration in elemewtary school children , 1972 .

[10]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension , 1980 .

[11]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[12]  Barbara Y. White.  Designing Computer Games to Facilitate Learning , 1981 .

[13]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[15]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[16]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics , 1980 .

[17]  Ronald J. Raven.  The development of the concept of momentum in primary school children , 1967 .

[18]  L. Ehri,et al.  Cognitive Style and Reasoning about Speed. , 1974 .

[19]  B. Shanon.  Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the Physics of the Layman , 1976, Perception.

[20]  David P. Maloney,et al.  Rule-governed approaches to physics - Newton's third law , 1984 .

[21]  E Saltiel,et al.  'Spontaneous' ways of reasoning in elementary kinematics , 1980 .

[22]  L. Leboutet-Barrell.  Concepts of mechanics among young people , 1976 .

[23]  W. Robertson,et al.  The Development of Some Physical Science Concepts in Secondary School Students. , 1975 .