Quantitative measurement of contact area and electron transport across platinum nanocontacts for scanning probe microscopy and electrical nanodevices

Conductive modes of atomic force microscopy are widely used to characterize the electronic properties of materials, and in such measurements, contact size is typically determined from current flow. Conversely, in nanodevice applications, the current flow is predicted from the estimated contact size. In both cases, it is very common to relate the contact size and current flow using well-established ballistic electron transport theory. Here we performed 19 electromechanical tests of platinum nanocontacts with in situ transmission electron microscopy to measure contact size and conductance. We also used molecular dynamics simulations of matched nanocontacts to investigate the nature of contact on the atomic scale. Together, these tests show that the ballistic transport equations under-predict the contact size by more than an order of magnitude. The measurements suggest that the low conductance of the contact cannot be explained by the scattering of electrons at defects nor by patchy contact due to surface roughness; instead, the lower-than-expected contact conductance is attributed to approximately a monolayer of insulating surface species on the platinum. Surprisingly, the low conductance persists throughout loading and even after significant sliding of the contact in vacuum. We apply tunneling theory and extract best-fit barrier parameters that describe the properties of this surface layer. The implications of this investigation are that electron transport in device-relevant platinum nanocontacts can be significantly limited by the presence and persistence of surface species, resulting in current flow that is better described by tunneling theory than ballistic electron transport, even for cleaned pure-platinum surfaces and even after loading and sliding in vacuum.

[1]  A. Martini,et al.  Understanding contact between platinum nanocontacts at low loads: The effect of reversible plasticity , 2018, Nanotechnology.

[2]  Xiaoli Hu,et al.  Substrate effect on electrical conductance at a nanoasperity-graphene contact , 2018, Carbon.

[3]  R. Sundararaman,et al.  The electrical resistivity of rough thin films: A model based on electron reflection at discrete step edges , 2018 .

[4]  Juekuan Yang,et al.  Effect of Electrical Contact Resistance on Measurement of Thermal Conductivity and Wiedemann-Franz Law for Individual Metallic Nanowires , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Ashlie Martini,et al.  Measuring and Understanding Contact Area at the Nanoscale: A Review , 2017 .

[6]  D. Srolovitz,et al.  Mechanisms of Contact, Adhesion, and Failure of Metallic Nanoasperities in the Presence of Adsorbates: Toward Conductive Contact Design. , 2017, ACS nano.

[7]  Gustavo A. Valencia-Zapata,et al.  Grain Boundary Resistance in Copper Interconnects from an Atomistic Model to a Neural Network , 2017, 1701.04897.

[8]  Ajuan Cui,et al.  Nanogap Electrodes towards Solid State Single-Molecule Transistors. , 2015, Small.

[9]  A. Rappe,et al.  Theoretical Modeling of Tribochemical Reaction on Pt and Au Contacts: Mechanical Load and Catalysis. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[10]  Zhanwen Xi,et al.  Electrical contact performance of MEMS acceleration switch fabricated by UV-LIGA technology , 2015 .

[11]  M. Miles,et al.  Conductive-AFM Patterning of Organic Semiconductors. , 2015, Small.

[12]  L. Pastewka,et al.  Simple scaling laws for contact area of rough spheres , 2015 .

[13]  H. Bender,et al.  Evaluation of the electrical contact area in contact-mode scanning probe microscopy , 2015 .

[14]  P. Kotula,et al.  On the thermal stability of physical vapor deposited oxide-hardened nanocrystalline gold thin films , 2015 .

[15]  E. Langlois,et al.  Scanning capacitance microscopy registration of buried atomic-precision donor devices , 2015, Nanotechnology.

[16]  F. Streller,et al.  Development and assessment of next-generation nanoelectromechanical switch contact materials , 2014, 14th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology.

[17]  S. Takeda,et al.  Oxidation and reduction processes of platinum nanoparticles observed at the atomic scale by environmental transmission electron microscopy. , 2014, Nanoscale.

[18]  Dirk Mayer,et al.  Mechanically Controllable Break Junctions for Molecular Electronics , 2013, Advanced materials.

[19]  J. McBride,et al.  A review of micro-contact physics for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) metal contact switches , 2013 .

[20]  K. Turner,et al.  The Effect of Atomic-Scale Roughness on the Adhesion of Nanoscale Asperities: A Combined Simulation and Experimental Investigation , 2013, Tribology Letters.

[21]  Hong Guo,et al.  Conductivity of an atomically defined metallic interface , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Longqiu Li,et al.  An electrical contact resistance model including roughness effect for a rough MEMS switch , 2012 .

[23]  P. Makk,et al.  Pulling platinum atomic chains by carbon monoxide molecules. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[24]  Owen Y Loh,et al.  Nanoelectromechanical contact switches. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[25]  Jeong Y. Park,et al.  Sensing current and forces with SPM , 2010 .

[26]  Shengfeng Cheng,et al.  Defining Contact at the Atomic Scale , 2010, 1004.1202.

[27]  Yifei Mo,et al.  Roughness picture of friction in dry nanoscale contacts , 2010 .

[28]  B. Luan,et al.  Contact and friction of nanoasperities: effects of adsorbed monolayers. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  T. Bjørnholm,et al.  Molecular electronics with single molecules in solid-state devices. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[30]  Kevin T. Turner,et al.  Friction laws at the nanoscale , 2009, Nature.

[31]  Mohammed A. Zikry,et al.  Temperature dependence of asperity contact and contact resistance in gold RF MEMS switches , 2009 .

[32]  J. Krim,et al.  Surface roughness, asperity contact and gold RF MEMS switch behavior , 2007 .

[33]  J. R. Reid,et al.  Microswitches with sputtered Au, AuPd,Au-on-AuPt, and AuPtCu alloy electric contacts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies.

[34]  Brian D. Jensen,et al.  Low-force contact heating and softening using micromechanical switches in diffusive-ballistic electron-transport transition , 2005 .

[35]  Kyriakos Komvopoulos,et al.  Electrical contact resistance theory for conductive rough surfaces separated by a thin insulating film , 2004 .

[36]  W. Vandervorst,et al.  Progress towards a physical contact model for scanning spreading resistance microscopy , 2003 .

[37]  Kyriakos Komvopoulos,et al.  Electrical contact resistance theory for conductive rough surfaces , 2003 .

[38]  Jan M. van Ruitenbeek,et al.  Quantum properties of atomic-sized conductors , 2002, cond-mat/0208239.

[39]  C. Untiedt,et al.  Common origin for surface reconstruction and the formation of chains of metal atoms. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[40]  D. Ugarte,et al.  Signature of atomic structure in the quantum conductance of gold nanowires. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[41]  Håkan Olin,et al.  Maxwell and Sharvin conductance in gold point contacts investigated using TEM-STM , 2000 .

[42]  J. Sader,et al.  Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers , 1999 .

[43]  D. F. Ogletree,et al.  Observation of proportionality between friction and contact area at the nanometer scale , 1999 .

[44]  P. B. Allen,et al.  Electron transport through a circular constriction , 1998, cond-mat/9811296.

[45]  N. Agraït,et al.  Formation and manipulation of a metallic wire of single gold atoms , 1998, Nature.

[46]  S. Majumder,et al.  Study of contacts in an electrostatically actuated microswitch , 1998, Electrical Contacts - 1998. Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (Cat. No.98CB36238).

[47]  Yukihito Kondo,et al.  Quantized conductance through individual rows of suspended gold atoms , 1998, Nature.

[48]  Mark A. Lantz,et al.  Characterization of tips for conducting atomic force microscopy in ultrahigh vacuum , 1998 .

[49]  D. F. Ogletree,et al.  Atomic Force Microscopy Study of an Ideally Hard Contact: The Diamond(111)/Tungsten Carbide Interface , 1998 .

[50]  Mark A. Lantz,et al.  Simultaneous force and conduction measurements in atomic force microscopy , 1997 .

[51]  Muller,et al.  One-atom point contacts. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[52]  D. Maugis Adhesion of spheres : the JKR-DMT transition using a dugdale model , 1992 .

[53]  Foiles,et al.  Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. , 1986, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[54]  J. Ketterson,et al.  The Fermi surface of platinum , 1978 .

[55]  M. Shatzkes,et al.  Electrical-Resistivity Model for Polycrystalline Films: the Case of Arbitrary Reflection at External Surfaces , 1970 .

[56]  A R Plummer Introduction to Solid State Physics , 1967 .

[57]  G. Wexler,et al.  The size effect and the non-local Boltzmann transport equation in orifice and disk geometry , 1966 .

[58]  J. Simmons Generalized Formula for the Electric Tunnel Effect between Similar Electrodes Separated by a Thin Insulating Film , 1963 .

[59]  H. Guoa,et al.  Conductivity of an atomically de fi ned metallic interface , 2016 .

[60]  B. Gotsmann,et al.  Quantized thermal transport across contacts of rough surfaces. , 2013, Nature materials.

[61]  U. Gösele,et al.  Carrier profiling of individual Si nanowires by scanning spreading resistance microscopy. , 2010, Nano letters.

[62]  Kwong‐Yu Chan,et al.  EFFECTIVE PAIRWISE POTENTIAL FOR SIMULATIONS OF ADSORBED PLATINUM , 1995 .

[63]  H. P. Van De Braak,et al.  Electrical Contacts , 1961, Nature.