This article suggests that the professional educational research community is facing new challenges in the development of educational research training. In particular it argues that as the learning needs of the student population become more differentiated, there is a strong pressure to develop and evaluate the use of information and communications technologies (ICTs) to support research training in education. The article describes one response to this pressure: the development and evaluation of an interactive multimedia (IMM) resource, the Signposts for Educational Research CD- ROM. The CD-ROM is designed to be used by postgraduate students on a wide range of courses but is particularly aimed at those enrolled on part-time and distance education programmes. Typically, part-time students studying at a distance from their providing institution use print-based materials in combination with occasional attend- ance at residential study schools; such residential schools frequently represent the only occasions on which tutors and students come together. Many distance learners therefore have limited contact with their tutors and peers, and only limited access to site-based resources. At the same time, because of their different prior experiences of formal academic study, there is considerable diversity in the individual needs of students registered on part-time and distance education programmes. This distinctive student profile indicates highly differentiated training requirements and thus the need for personal and customised support for research training. One of the reasons for producing the Signposts CD-ROM was the perceived need to offer such students alternative modes of learning support. It is argued that the flexible structure of IMM materials may be effective in meeting the individual needs of students while the use of affective material (in the form of a 'peer voice') may help to build the confidence, and lessen the isolation, of the distance learner. The article concludes with a discussion of the impact on learning of IMM resources. In particular, it asks whether research students can 'become critical' in a multimedia environment, and attempts to assess some of the methodological difficulties involved in evaluating the use of lMM to support learning in
[1]
C. Day.
Being a Professional in Schools and Universities: limits, purposes and possibilities for development
,
1997
.
[2]
Diana Laurillard.
Multimedia and the changing experience of the learner
,
1995,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[3]
D. Mcintyre.
The Profession of Educational Research
,
1997
.
[4]
M. David Merrill,et al.
Constructivism and Instructional Design
,
1991
.
[5]
Farhad Saba,et al.
Open and Distance Education.
,
1999
.
[6]
M. Hammersley.
Educational Research and Teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture
,
1997
.
[7]
D. Rowntree.
Motivating teachers for materials‐based learning
,
1998
.
[8]
J. Hartley.
Multimedia Views of Science Education
,
1994
.
[9]
E. Boyer.
Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate
,
1990
.
[10]
R. Haber,et al.
Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli
,
1970
.
[11]
Adrian Boucher,et al.
Information technology-based teaching and learning in higher education: a view of the economic issues
,
1998
.
[12]
M. Atkins,et al.
Evaluating Interactive Technologies for Learning.
,
1993
.
[13]
Gill Kirkup.
Gender Issues and Learning Technologies
,
1995,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[14]
Madeleine Atkins,et al.
Are they thinking? Are they learning?: a study of the use of interactive video
,
1993
.
[15]
Rigmor George.
Open and distance education as social practice
,
1995
.
[16]
Rita Johnston,et al.
The university of the future: Boyer revisited
,
1998
.
[17]
G. Pask.
STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING
,
1976
.