xPyder: A PyMOL Plugin To Analyze Coupled Residues and Their Networks in Protein Structures

A versatile method to directly identify and analyze short- or long-range coupled or communicating residues in a protein conformational ensemble is of extreme relevance to achieve a complete understanding of protein dynamics and structural communication routes. Here, we present xPyder, an interface between one of the most employed molecular graphics systems, PyMOL, and the analysis of dynamical cross-correlation matrices (DCCM). The approach can also be extended, in principle, to matrices including other indexes of communication propensity or intensity between protein residues, as well as the persistence of intra- or intermolecular interactions, such as those underlying protein dynamics. The xPyder plugin for PyMOL 1.4 and 1.5 is offered as Open Source software via the GPL v2 license, and it can be found, along with the installation package, the user guide, and examples, at http://linux.btbs.unimib.it/xpyder/.

[1]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Interaction energy based protein structure networks. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[2]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[3]  S. Soddu,et al.  The Loss of the p53 Activator HIPK2 Is Responsible for Galectin-3 Overexpression in Well Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  C. Michelle,et al.  What Was the Set of Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Conjugating Enzymes in the Eukaryote Common Ancestor? , 2009, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[5]  Stefano Pascarella,et al.  PyMod: sequence similarity searches, multiple sequence-structure alignments, and homology modeling within PyMOL , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  K. Teilum,et al.  Functional aspects of protein flexibility , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[8]  James O. Wrabl,et al.  The role of protein conformational fluctuations in allostery, function, and evolution. , 2011, Biophysical chemistry.

[9]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics , 2005, Proteins.

[11]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Protein intrinsic disorder and human papillomaviruses: increased amount of disorder in E6 and E7 oncoproteins from high risk HPVs. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  RING: networking interacting residues, evolutionary information and energetics in protein structures , 2011, Bioinform..

[13]  Olivier Lichtarge,et al.  PyETV: a PyMOL evolutionary trace viewer to analyze functional site predictions in protein complexes , 2010, Bioinform..

[14]  Lorenzo Segovia,et al.  Identification of functional motions in the adenylate kinase (ADK) protein family by computational hybrid approaches , 2011, Proteins.

[15]  Kristian Rother,et al.  Voronoia: analyzing packing in protein structures , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  On the Conservation of the Slow Conformational Dynamics within the Amino Acid Kinase Family: NAGK the Paradigm , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Sean D. Mooney,et al.  MutDB services: interactive structural analysis of mutation data , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  ProDy: Protein Dynamics Inferred from Theory and Experiments , 2011, Bioinform..

[19]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Defining the Conserved Internal Architecture of a Protein Kinase , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Conserved amino acids participate in the structure networks deputed to intramolecular communication in the lutropin receptor , 2011, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[21]  M Vendruscolo,et al.  Toward an energy function for the contact map representation of proteins , 2000, Proteins.

[22]  Álvaro Cortés Cabrera,et al.  VSDMIP 1.5: an automated structure- and ligand-based virtual screening platform with a PyMOL graphical user interface , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[23]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Intra and inter-molecular communications through protein structure network. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[24]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Toward a Unified Representation of Protein Structural Dynamics in Solution , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Matteo Tiberti,et al.  Molecular Dynamics of Mesophilic-Like Mutants of a Cold-Adapted Enzyme: Insights into Distal Effects Induced by the Mutations , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Michael Lappe,et al.  CMView: Interactive contact map visualization and analysis , 2011, Bioinform..

[28]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Investigating the local flexibility of functional residues in hemoproteins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  GraProStr - Graphs of Protein Structures: A Tool for Constructing the Graphs and Generating Graph Parameters for Protein Structures , 2011 .

[30]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[31]  Csaba Böde,et al.  Network analysis of protein dynamics , 2007, FEBS letters.

[32]  Z. Nevin Gerek,et al.  Collective Dynamics Differentiates Functional Divergence in Protein Evolution , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  R. Dror,et al.  Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  Giuseppe Manco,et al.  The conserved N-terminal helix of acylpeptide hydrolase from archaeon Aeropyrum pernix K1 is important for its hyperthermophilic activity. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[35]  A. Mark,et al.  Fluctuation and cross-correlation analysis of protein motions observed in nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  FlexServ: an integrated tool for the analysis of protein flexibility , 2009, Bioinform..

[37]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  HBonanza: a computer algorithm for molecular-dynamics-trajectory hydrogen-bond analysis. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[38]  Matthew L. Danielson,et al.  Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[39]  Matteo Tiberti,et al.  Mechanisms of Intramolecular Communication in a Hyperthermophilic Acylaminoacyl Peptidase: A Molecular Dynamics Investigation , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  J. Echave,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of protein vibrational dynamics. , 2008, Gene.

[41]  Fei Xia,et al.  Dynamic Allostery in the Methionine Repressor Revealed by Force Distribution Analysis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Kristian Rother,et al.  eMovie: a storyboard-based tool for making molecular movies. , 2007, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[43]  Lila M Gierasch,et al.  The changing landscape of protein allostery. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[44]  Elena Papaleo,et al.  Protein flexibility in psychrophilic and mesophilic trypsins. Evidence of evolutionary conservation of protein dynamics in trypsin‐like serine‐proteases , 2008, FEBS letters.

[45]  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Paths of long-range communication in the E2 enzymes of family 3: a molecular dynamics investigation. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[46]  Georges Feller,et al.  Temperature adaptation of proteins: engineering mesophilic-like activity and stability in a cold-adapted alpha-amylase. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Wordom: A User-Friendly Program for the Analysis of Molecular Structures, Trajectories, and Free Energy Surfaces , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[48]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Deciphering the deformation modes associated with function retention and specialization in members of the Ras superfamily. , 2010, Structure.

[49]  Robert D. Carr,et al.  1001 Optimal PDB Structure Alignments: Integer Programming Methods for Finding the Maximum Contact Map Overlap , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..

[50]  Julian Echave,et al.  Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Elena Papaleo,et al.  C-Terminal acidic domain of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes: a multi-functional conserved intrinsically disordered domain in family 3 of E2 enzymes. , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[52]  Ganesh S Anand,et al.  Multistate allostery in response regulators: phosphorylation and mutagenesis activate RegA via alternate modes. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  W. Taylor,et al.  Exploring the factors determining the dynamics of different protein folds , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[55]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.

[56]  Douglas L. Theobald,et al.  Accurate Structural Correlations from Maximum Likelihood Superpositions , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[57]  Jaroslav Koca,et al.  CAVER: a new tool to explore routes from protein clefts, pockets and cavities , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[58]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A study of communication pathways in methionyl- tRNA synthetase by molecular dynamics simulations and structure network analysis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Giorgio Colombo,et al.  Modeling Signal Propagation Mechanisms and Ligand-Based Conformational Dynamics of the Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone Full-Length Dimer , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[60]  Chandra S Verma,et al.  Chemical states of the N-terminal “lid” of MDM2 regulate p53 binding: Simulations reveal complexities of modulation , 2011, Cell cycle.

[61]  David P Lane,et al.  Molecular simulations of protein dynamics: new windows on mechanisms in biology , 2008, EMBO reports.

[62]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Frontier residues lining globin internal cavities present specific mechanical properties. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[63]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Coevolving residues of (beta/alpha)(8)-barrel proteins play roles in stabilizing active site architecture and coordinating protein dynamics. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[64]  Paul Weakliem,et al.  Statistical coevolution analysis and molecular dynamics: identification of amino acid pairs essential for catalysis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Dimerization and ligand binding affect the structure network of A(2A) adenosine receptor. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[66]  Matteo Tiberti,et al.  Dynamic properties of extremophilic subtilisin-like serine-proteases. , 2011, Journal of structural biology.

[67]  Nadezhda T. Doncheva,et al.  Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[68]  James H. Naismith,et al.  MtsslWizard: In Silico Spin-Labeling and Generation of Distance Distributions in PyMOL , 2012, Applied Magnetic Resonance.

[69]  M. Karplus,et al.  Allostery and cooperativity revisited , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[70]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Integration of protein motions with molecular networks reveals different mechanisms for permanent and transient interactions , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[71]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[72]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  CCRXP: exploring clusters of conserved residues in protein structures , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[73]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  Francesco L Gervasio,et al.  The different flexibility of c-Src and c-Abl kinases regulates the accessibility of a druggable inactive conformation. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[75]  Nadezhda T. Doncheva,et al.  Analyzing and visualizing residue networks of protein structures. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[76]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  A consensus view of protein dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  R. Dror,et al.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[78]  Yuchun Lin,et al.  “Fluctuograms” Reveal the Intermittent Intra-Protein Communication in Subtilisin Carlsberg and Correlate Mechanical Coupling with Co-Evolution , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[79]  J. Echave,et al.  A perturbative view of protein structural variation , 2010, Proteins.

[80]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[82]  Rafael Ördög.  PyDeT, a PyMOL plug-in for visualizing geometric concepts around proteins , 2008 .

[83]  S. Ackerman,et al.  The Contribution of Coevolving Residues to the Stability of KDO8P Synthase , 2011, PloS one.

[84]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Conservation of side-chain dynamics within a protein family. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.