Computer-assisted argument mapping: a rationale approach

[1]  Anna Jones.  Generic attributes as espoused theory: the importance of context , 2009 .

[2]  J. Simon.  Concept Mapping in a Financial Accounting Theory Course , 2007 .

[3]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  The rationale for Rationale , 2007 .

[4]  Martin Davies.  Cognitive contours: recent work on cross-cultural psychology and its relevance for education , 2007 .

[5]  Martin Davies.  An ‘infusion’ approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate , 2006 .

[6]  T. Gelder.  Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science , 2005 .

[7]  Maralee Harrell,et al.  Using Argument Diagrams to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in 80-100 What Philosophy Is , 2005 .

[8]  L. Nilson,et al.  Show Them the Money: Using Mind Mapping in the Introductory Finance Course , 2004 .

[9]  Geoff Cumming,et al.  Cultivating expertise in informal reasoning. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  Charles R. Twardy.  Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking , 2004 .

[11]  T. Moore,et al.  The critical thinking debate: how general are general thinking skills? , 2004 .

[12]  D. Hitchcock.  The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Critical Thinking , 2004 .

[13]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Tom Solon.  Teaching Critical Thinking: The More, the Better! , 2003 .

[15]  R. Nisbett.  The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why , 2003 .

[16]  Geoff Cumming,et al.  Reason! Project Studies, 1999-2002 , 2002 .

[17]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Improving Critical Thinking in an Introductory Psychology Course. , 2001 .

[19]  Problems and Useful Techniques: My Experiences in Teaching Courses in Argumentation, Informal Logic and Critical Thinking , 2000 .

[20]  Robert H. Ennis.  Incorporating Critical Thinking in the Curriculum: An Introduction to Some Basic Issues , 1997 .

[21]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  D. Halpern.  Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[23]  N. Noddings.  Philosophy of education , 1995 .

[24]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[25]  Victor Quinn.  In Defence of Critical Thinking as a Subject: if McPeck is wrong he is wrong , 1994 .

[26]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  The generalizability of critical thinking : multiple perspectives on an educational ideal , 1992 .

[27]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[28]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[29]  N. Entwistle.  Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students , 1988 .

[30]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Cognitive Skill Acquisition: A Developmental Approach , 1987 .

[31]  J. H. McMillan,et al.  Enhancing college students' critical thinking: A review of studies , 1987 .

[32]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Learning Problems of Overseas Students: Two Sides of a Story , 1987 .

[33]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[34]  Robert H. Ennis.  Critical Thinking and the Curriculum. , 1985 .

[35]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Styles of learning and teaching , 1981 .

[36]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[37]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[38]  Ged Martin.  Economic Motives Behind the Founding of Botany Bay , 1976 .

[39]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .