Over 4 iterations of a large course (>180 students) in introductory emedia design in a first year computer science course we have seen a year on year improvement. We believe this is down to the use of evs clickers for feed-forward assessment: that is to say a method of getting the whole class to evaluate previous cohorts’ submissions in public and discussing them, bringing to light the various properties they posess and how this maps to the marking rubric. This impacts on the students practices as they attempt their assignment. Over time, the practice has become more refined, principally through a rewritten criteria sheet, better training samples, and finally the development of a hybrid in-class assessment: the swarmative assessment combining both formative and summative practices and relying on its visibly social nature for its transformative power. This involves (a) evaluating previous submissions (in a non-graded way) – allowing for the free exercise of discriminative judgment not measured against any “authoritative” standard, but also (b) answering a set of objective questions about the work being assessed (what techniques were used to realize various effects). It ensures full cohort coverage together with engagement with the marking criteria.
[1]
Susan Armstrong,et al.
Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: the usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject
,
2011
.
[2]
D. Sluijsmans,et al.
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
,
2010
.
[3]
K. Topping.
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
,
1998
.
[4]
Chris Rust,et al.
Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria
,
2004
.
[5]
D. Royce Sadler,et al.
Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards
,
1987
.
[6]
A. Chickering,et al.
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
,
1987,
CORE.
[7]
Etienne Wenger,et al.
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
,
1998
.
[8]
Matthew Manning,et al.
Feed-forward assessment, exemplars and peer marking: evidence of efficacy
,
2013
.
[9]
N. Falchikov,et al.
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
,
2000
.