Monitoring changes in velocity and Q using non-physical arrivals in seismic interferometry

Application of seismic interferometry to records from receivers at the Earth’s surface from sources in wells retrieves the reflection response measured at the receivers as if from virtual sources located also at the surface. When the wavefields experience intrinsic losses during propagation, non-physical arrivals (ghosts) would appear in the retrieved result. These ghosts appear due to waves that reflect inside a subsurface layer. Thus, a ghost contains information about the seismic properties of the specific layer. We show how such ghosts can be used to monitor layer-specific changes in the velocity and intrinsic losses in the subsurface. We show how to identify the ghosts using numerical-modelling results from a vertical well, and how to estimate the layer-specific velocity and quality-factor changes using numerical-modelling results from a horizontal well as well as ultrasonic S-wave laboratory data.

[1]  Andrey Bakulin,et al.  Virtual Source: New Method For Imaging And 4D Below Complex Overburden , 2004 .

[2]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Acquisition geometry requirements for generating virtual-source data , 2008 .

[3]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Theory of Acoustic Daylight Imaging Revisited , 2002 .

[4]  K. Wapenaar.  Retrieving the elastodynamic Green's function of an arbitrary inhomogeneous medium by cross correlation. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[5]  Kurang Mehta,et al.  Virtual Refraction Tomography: Application to Realistic 3D Model , 2011 .

[6]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Improving the virtual‐source method by wavefield separation , 2007 .

[7]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Interferometry by deconvolution. Part 1 -Theory for acoustic waves and numerical examples , 2008 .

[8]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  Green's function representations for seismic interferometry , 2006 .

[9]  R. Tonn,et al.  THE DETERMINATION OF THE SEISMIC QUALITY FACTOR Q FROM VSP DATA: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT COMPUTATIONAL METHODS1 , 1991 .

[10]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Retrieving the Green's function of the diffusion equation from the response to a random forcing. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  R. Ghose,et al.  Contrasting behavior between dispersive seismic velocity and attenuation: advantages in subsoil characterization. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Seismic interferometry, intrinsic losses and Q‐estimation * , 2010 .

[13]  D. Draganov.  Seismic and electromagnetic interferometry: retrieval of the earth's reflection response using crosscorrelation , 2007 .

[14]  Evert Slob,et al.  Interferometric electromagnetic Green's functions representations using propagation invariants , 2007 .

[15]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Representation theorems and Green's function retrieval for scattering in acoustic media. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Extracting the Green's function of attenuating heterogeneous acoustic media from uncorrelated waves. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Andrey Bakulin,et al.  The virtual source method: Theory and case study , 2006 .

[18]  J-M Kendall,et al.  A review of crosscorrelation and multidimensional deconvolution seismic interferometry for passive data , 2009 .

[19]  David Halliday,et al.  Source-receiver wave field interferometry. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  Global‐scale seismic interferometry: theory and numerical examples , 2008 .

[21]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Estimation of the effect of nonisotropically distributed energy on the apparent arrival time in correlations , 2009 .

[22]  R. Snieder.  Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: a derivation based on stationary phase. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Travis L. Poole,et al.  Interferometric velocity analysis using physical and nonphysical energy , 2011 .

[24]  Josh Nichols,et al.  Application of the virtual refraction to near‐surface characterization at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site ‡ , 2010 .

[25]  Andrey Bakulin,et al.  Reconstructing Head Waves With Virtual Source Method , 2008 .

[26]  J. Sheng,et al.  Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging , 2004 .

[27]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Suppressing nonphysical reflections in Green's function estimates using source-receiver interferometry , 2012 .

[28]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Theory of Daylight/Interferometric Imaging - Tutorial , 2001 .

[29]  A. Paul,et al.  Long-Range Correlations in the Diffuse Seismic Coda , 2003, Science.

[30]  Shuqian Dong,et al.  Theory and Practice of Refraction Interferometry , 2006 .

[31]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Spurious multiples in seismic interferometry of primaries , 2006 .

[32]  David Halliday,et al.  Seismic interferometry of scattered surface waves in attenuative media , 2009 .

[33]  Evert Slob,et al.  Seismic and electromagnetic controlled‐source interferometry in dissipative media , 2008 .

[34]  Jan Thorbecke,et al.  Finite-difference modeling experiments for seismic interferometry , 2011 .

[35]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response , 1968 .

[36]  Dylan Mikesell,et al.  The virtual refraction: Useful spurious energy in seismic interferometry , 2008 .

[37]  E. Slob,et al.  Unified Green's function retrieval by cross correlation. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[38]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Theory of supervirtual refraction interferometry , 2012 .

[39]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Interferometry by deconvolution: Part 2 — Theory for elastic waves and application to drill-bit seismic imaging , 2008 .

[40]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Green's function retrieval by cross‐correlation in case of one‐sided illumination , 2006 .