Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE We assessed the outcome of a watchful-waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention by using clinical prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or histologic progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective, single-arm, cohort study. Patients were managed with an initial expectant approach. Definitive intervention was offered to those patients with a PSA doubling time of less than 3 years, Gleason score progression (to 4 + 3 or greater), or unequivocal clinical progression. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were applied to the data. Results A total of 450 patients have been observed with active surveillance. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 13 years). Overall survival was 78.6%. The 10-year prostate cancer actuarial survival was 97.2%. Overall, 30% of patients have been reclassified as higher risk and have been offered definitive therapy. Of 117 patients treated radically, the PSA failure rate was 50%, which was 13% of the total cohort. PSA doubling time of 3 years or less was associated with an 8.5-times higher risk of biochemical failure after definitive treatment compared with a doubling time of more than 3 years (P < .0001). The hazard ratio for nonprostate cancer to prostate cancer mortality was 18.6 at 10 years. CONCLUSION We observed a low rate of prostate cancer mortality. Among the patients who were reclassified as higher risk and who were treated, PSA failure was relatively common. Other-cause mortality accounted for almost all of the deaths. Additional studies are warranted to improve the identification of patients who harbor more aggressive disease despite favorable clinical parameters at diagnosis.

[1]  J H Wasson,et al.  A structured literature review of treatment for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Disease Patient Outcome Research Team. , 1993, Archives of family medicine.

[2]  L. Klotz Active surveillance for prostate cancer: for whom? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  K. Ali,et al.  PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening‐detected prostate cancer: Results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section , 2006 .

[4]  E. Metter,et al.  Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience , 2007 .

[5]  Liying Zhang,et al.  Modeling prostate specific antigen kinetics in patients on active surveillance. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[6]  J. Johansson,et al.  Expectant management of early stage prostatic cancer: Swedish experience. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J. Hugosson,et al.  Erratum: PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: Results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section (International Journal of Cancer (2007) 120, (170-174)) , 2007 .

[8]  B. Hølund Latent prostatic cancer in a consecutive autopsy series. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[9]  T. Tammela,et al.  Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. , 2009, European urology.

[10]  Paul W Dickman,et al.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer. , 2004, JAMA.

[11]  M. Barry,et al.  A decision analysis of alternative treatment strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team. , 1993, JAMA.

[12]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2009 .

[13]  M. Remzi,et al.  The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Steve Williams,et al.  Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience , 2007, BJU international.

[15]  Neil Fleshner,et al.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[16]  L. M. Franks,et al.  Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology of prostatic cancer , 1973 .

[17]  Alan Horwich,et al.  Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. , 2008, European urology.

[18]  L. M. Franks Proceedings: Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology of prostatic cancer. , 1973, Cancer.