Improvement of muscle healing through enhancement of muscle regeneration and prevention of fibrosis

Skeletal muscle is able to repair itself through regeneration. However, an injured muscle often does not fully recover its strength because complete muscle regeneration is hindered by the development of fibrosis. Biological approaches to improve muscle healing by enhancing muscle regeneration and reducing the formation of fibrosis are being investigated. Previously, we have determined that insulin‐like growth factor–1 (IGF‐1) can improve muscle regeneration in injured muscle. We also have investigated the use of an antifibrotic agent, decorin, to reduce muscle fibrosis following injury. The aim of this study was to combine these two therapeutic methods in an attempt to develop a new biological approach to promote efficient healing and recovery of strength after muscle injuries. Our findings indicate that further improvement in the healing of muscle lacerations is attained histologically by the combined administration of IGF‐1 to enhance muscle regeneration and decorin to reduce the formation of fibrosis. This improvement was not associated with improved responses to physiological testing, at least at the time‐points tested in this study. Muscle Nerve 28: 365–372, 2003

[1]  R. Iozzo,et al.  Decorin Binds to a Narrow Region of the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Receptor, Partially Overlapping but Distinct from the EGF-binding Epitope* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Yong Li,et al.  Differentiation of muscle-derived cells into myofibroblasts in injured skeletal muscle. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[3]  R. Iozzo,et al.  Suppression of tumorigenicity by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of decorin , 2002, Oncogene.

[4]  Yong Li,et al.  Muscle injuries and repair: current trends in research. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  O. Eickelberg Endless healing: TGF‐β, SMADs, and fibrosis , 2001 .

[6]  Johnny Huard,et al.  The Use of an Antifibrosis Agent to Improve Muscle Recovery after Laceration * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  R. Bucala,et al.  Peripheral Blood Fibrocytes: Differentiation Pathway and Migration to Wound Sites1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[8]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Relation between myofibers and connective tissue during muscle injury repair , 2000, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[9]  T. Best,et al.  Muscle injury and repair. , 2000, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[10]  H Kalimo,et al.  Muscle strain injuries. , 2000, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[11]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Use of Growth Factors to Improve Muscle Healing After Strain Injury , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Huard,et al.  Suturing versus immobilization of a muscle laceration: A morphological and functional study in a mouse model , 1999 .

[13]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Suturing Versus Immobilization of a Muscle Laceration , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Development of approaches to improve the healing following muscle contusion. , 1998, Cell transplantation.

[15]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Biologic Intervention in Muscle Healing and Regeneration , 1998 .

[16]  R. Braun,et al.  Antifibrotic effect of decorin in a bleomycin hamster model of lung fibrosis. , 1997, Biochemical pharmacology.

[17]  Y. Kaneda,et al.  Gene therapy by skeletal muscle expression of decorin prevents fibrotic disease in rat kidney , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[18]  G. Romeo,et al.  Insulin-like growth factors I and II stimulate extracellular matrix production in human glomerular mesangial cells. Comparison with transforming growth factor-beta. , 1996, Endocrinology.

[19]  R. Bucala,et al.  Circulating Fibrocytes Define a New Leukocyte Subpopulation That Mediates Tissue Repair , 1994, Molecular medicine.

[20]  E. Kovacs,et al.  Fibrogenic cytokines and connective tissue production , 1994, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[21]  M. Lehto,et al.  The Effects of Early Mobilisation and Immobilisation on the Healing Process Following Muscle Injuries , 1993, Sports medicine.

[22]  H. Kalimo,et al.  Activation of myogenic precursor cells after muscle injury. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  H. Schmalbruch,et al.  Desmin and vimentin in regenerating muscles , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  W. Garrett Muscle strain injuries: clinical and basic aspects. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  W. Stauber,et al.  Extracellular matrix changes following blunt trauma to rat skeletal muscles. , 1990, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[26]  M. Sporn,et al.  Transforming growth factor type beta: rapid induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis in vivo and stimulation of collagen formation in vitro. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  W E Garrett,et al.  Recovery of skeletal muscle after laceration and repair. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[28]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Growth factors improve muscle healing in vivo. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  A. Pandit,et al.  The effect of TGF-beta delivered through a collagen scaffold on wound healing. , 1999, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[30]  G. Laurent,et al.  Mechanisms of tissue repair: from wound healing to fibrosis. , 1997, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[31]  W. Border,et al.  Transforming growth factor beta in tissue fibrosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  J. Jenner,et al.  Soft tissue injuries in sport , 1988 .