The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar

Purpose – A previous paper by the present author described the pros and cons of using the three largest cited reference enhanced multidisciplinary databases and discussed and illustrated in general how the theoretically sound idea of the h‐index may become distorted depending on the software and the content of the database(s) used, and the searchers' skill and knowledge of the database features. The aim of this paper is to focus on Google Scholar (GS), from the perspective of calculating the h‐index for individuals and journals.Design/methodology/approach – A desk‐based approach to data collection is used and critical commentary is added.Findings – The paper shows that effective corroboration of the h‐index and its two component indicators can be done only on persons and journals with which a researcher is intimately familiar. Corroborative tests must be done in every database for important research.Originality/value – The paper highlights the very time‐consuming process of corroborating data, tracing and...

[1]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007 .

[3]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Google Scholar revisited , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[4]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[5]  J. Hirsch.  Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Chris Neuhaus,et al.  The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study , 2006 .

[10]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  On the robustness of the h-index , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[12]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.

[13]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Ranking forestry journals using the h-index , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[15]  Christoph Neuhaus,et al.  Google Scholar Goes to School: The Presence of Google Scholar on College and University Web Sites , 2008 .