Embeddable corrosion rate‐measuring sensor for assessing the corrosion risk of steel in concrete structures

New and rehabilitated concrete structures need assessment of corrosion rate (CR) of rebars more precisely to ensure efficiency of protection against corrosion. For assessing the corrosion status, different sensors have been developed to reduce the risk of undetected corrosion problems. An embeddable CR-measuring sensor is embedded either closer to the rod during the construction of a new structure or in drilled holes in old structures so as to generate reliable data. In the present paper, the accuracy in predicting the corrosion current (Icorr) by embeddable sensor was assessed by comparing with other conventional electrode arrangements. Icorr was assessed under passive and active conditions of rebar. The presence of a cross bar and the effect of cover on Icorr were also studied. Using linear polarization resistance (LPR) technique and electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) technique, the CR was determined and compared with the weight-loss method. Results concluded that by using electrochemical impedance technique, developed embeddable sensor is able to predict the CR very close to the CR determined from gravimetric method. The deviation from an ideal linear curve and the higher interfacial capacitance of steel in concrete caused the LPR method to underestimate the CR of rebar. The presence of the cross bar increases the Icorr of the main bar by 4 times in a passive state of the rebar and it has no effect if the rebar is in an active state. The embedded sensor, though having smaller counter electrode (CE), polarizes the rebar up to 2 times the length of CE under both active and passive states.

[1]  Carmen Andrade,et al.  Errors in the electrochemical evaluation of very small corrosion rates—I. polarization resistance method applied to corrosion of steel in concrete , 1985 .

[2]  Kevin Davies,et al.  The use of permanent corrosion monitoring in new and existing reinforced concrete structures , 2002 .

[3]  Lan Chung,et al.  Development of a galvanic sensor system for detecting the corrosion damage of the steel embedded in concrete structure: Part 2. Laboratory electrochemical testing of sensors in concrete , 2005 .

[4]  Y Schiegg,et al.  Assessment of reinforcement corrosion by means of galvanostatic pulse technique , 1997 .

[5]  Walter N. Snow.  Survey of the Sunflower State: ConcreteTechnology Through the Years , 1984 .

[6]  R. Myrdal.  Potential Gradients In Concrete Caused By Charge Separations In A Complex Electrolyte , 1997 .

[7]  S. Sathiyanarayanan,et al.  Corrosion monitoring of steel in concrete by galvanostatic pulse technique , 2006 .

[8]  William John McCarter,et al.  NEAR-SURFACE SENSORS FOR CONDITION MONITORING OF COVER-ZONE CONCRETE , 2001 .

[9]  R. Myrdal.  Phenomena That Disturb the Measurement of Potentials in Concrete , 1996 .

[10]  Howard W. Pickering,et al.  Electrochemical Measurements on Concrete Bridges for Evaluation of Reinforcement Corrosion Rates , 1993 .

[11]  P. Basheer,et al.  Field monitoring of electrical conductivity of cover-zone concrete , 2005 .

[12]  P. Novák,et al.  Limitations of the linear polarization method to determine stainless steel corrosion rate in concrete environment , 2006 .

[13]  M. Stern,et al.  Electrochemical Polarization I . A Theoretical Analysis of the Shape of Polarization Curves , 1957 .

[14]  E Escalante,et al.  Measuring the Rate of Corrosion of Steel in Concrete , 1990 .

[15]  Michael Raupach,et al.  Monitoring system for the corrosion risk of steel in concrete structures , 1992 .

[16]  W. J. Hadden,et al.  A Comparison of , 1971 .

[17]  Dubravka Bjegović,et al.  Test protocols for migrating corrosion inhibitors (MCI®) in reinforced concrete , 2000 .

[18]  Victor Chaker.  Corrosion effect of stray currents and the techniques for evaluating corrosion of rebars in concrete : a symposium , 1986 .

[19]  Alberto A. Sagüés,et al.  Characterization of Activated Titanium Solid Reference Electrodes for Corrosion Testing of Steel in Concrete , 1996 .

[20]  W. John McCarter,et al.  Sensor systems for use in reinforced concrete structures , 2004 .

[21]  Cruz Alonso,et al.  The Determination of the Corrosion Rate of Steel Embedded in Concrete by the Polarization Resistance and AC Impedance Methods , 1986 .

[22]  Lan Chung,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A GALVANIC SENSOR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING THE CORROSION DAMAGE OF THE STEEL EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE STRUCTURES: PART 1. LABORATORY TESTS TO CORRELATE GALVANIC CURRENT WITH ACTUAL DAMAGE , 2003 .

[23]  Martin W. Kendig,et al.  Technical Note: Concerning the Choice of Scan Rate in Polarization Measurements , 1981 .

[24]  A. Cobo,et al.  On-site determination of corrosion rate in reinforced concrete structures by use of galvanostatic pulses , 2001 .

[25]  A. Sehgal,et al.  COMPARISON OF CORROSION RATE-MEASURING DEVICES FOR DETERMINING CORROSION RATE OF STEEL-IN--CONCRETE SYSTEMS , 1992 .

[26]  J. M. Miranda,et al.  Considerations on reproducibility of potential and corrosion rate measurements in reinforced concrete , 2004 .