The social embeddedness of brownfield regeneration actors: Insights from social network analysis

Abstract Stakeholder involvement in land management has been considered in both normative and analytical terms, but often in an undifferentiated way. The article aims to compare these two perspectives by proposing, first, a mixed methods approach consisting of semistructured interviews and social network analysis. Second, it explores a social network of stakeholders by inductively developing and illustrating three indicators of social embeddedness. These are the relative embeddedness of stakeholder groups, the level of overall network coherence across multiple regeneration goals, and the relative distance between non-decision makers and those making decisions. The case study used is the regeneration of Area 2, a site in Porto Marghera, Italy. The article concludes by presenting a baseline assessment of the Area 2 regeneration network and suggesting several widely applicable ways to foster stakeholder involvement in regeneration processes via improved communication.

[2]  M. Cuthill,et al.  Strengthening the ‘social’ in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia , 2010 .

[3]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[4]  D. Mcadam,et al.  A Theory of Fields , 2012 .

[5]  K. Murphy.  The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis , 2012 .

[6]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Idalina Dias Sardinha,et al.  A sustainability framework for redevelopment of rural brownfields: stakeholder participation at SÃO DOMINGOS mine, Portugal , 2013 .

[8]  Joe Doak,et al.  Actor Networks: The Brownfield Merry‐Go‐Round , 2008 .

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[11]  Abir Al-Tabbaa,et al.  Factor analysis and structural equation modelling of sustainable behaviour in contaminated land remediation , 2014 .

[12]  Frank A. Swartjes,et al.  Dealing with Contaminated Sites: From Theory towards Practical Application , 2012 .

[13]  Deborah G. Martin,et al.  Relational place-making: the networked politics of place , 2011 .

[14]  Örjan Bodin,et al.  A social relational approach to natural resource governance , 2011 .

[15]  C. Prell.  Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology , 2011 .

[16]  M. V. Valkenburg.  Network Analysis , 1964 .

[17]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Regional risk assessment approaches to land planning for industrial polluted areas in China: the Hulunbeier region case study. , 2014, Environment international.

[18]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[19]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[20]  Filip Alexandrescu,et al.  The Path From Passivity Toward Entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[21]  C. Paul Nathanail,et al.  Sustainability and Remediation , 2011 .

[22]  Örjan Bodin,et al.  Some basic structural characteristics of networks , 2011 .

[23]  Michael Scott,et al.  Re-theorizing social network analysis and environmental governance , 2015 .

[24]  Abir Al-Tabbaa,et al.  Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation , 2014 .

[25]  Urs Wiesmann,et al.  Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali , 2007 .

[26]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[27]  D. Huisingh,et al.  Are lessons from eco-towns helping planners make more effective progress in transforming cities into sustainable urban systems: a literature review (part 2 of 2) , 2015 .

[28]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[29]  C. P. Nathanail,et al.  Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration , 2011 .

[30]  Katie Williams,et al.  A framework for assessing the sustainability of brownfield developments , 2007 .

[31]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  N Witters,et al.  Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for "gentle" remediation approaches: the European context. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Örjan Bodin,et al.  Social Networks and Natural Resource Management , 2011 .

[34]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[35]  Annika Sandström,et al.  Social networks, joint image building, and adaptability : the case of local fishery management , 2011 .

[36]  C. P. Nathanail,et al.  Integrating the Social Dimension in Remediation Decision-Making: State of the Practice and Way Forward , 2015 .

[37]  Paul Bardos,et al.  Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  S. Pollard,et al.  Current directions in the practice of environmental risk assessment in the United Kingdom. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  H. Bernard.  Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .

[40]  R. Colvin,et al.  Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: Insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects’ , 2016 .

[41]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[42]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[43]  Paul Syms.  Redeveloping brownfield land The decision‐making process , 1999 .

[44]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Brownfield regeneration in Europe: Identifying stakeholder perceptions, concerns, attitudes and information needs , 2015 .

[45]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[46]  B. García.  Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration in Western European Cities: Lessons from Experience, Prospects for the Future , 2004 .