Multi-indicator inference scheme for fuzzy assessment of power system transient stability

A multi-indicator inference scheme is proposed in this paper to achieve an intuitive assessment of post-fault transient stability of power systems. The proposed scheme uses the fuzzy inference technique to classify the stability level as “safe,” “low-risk,” “high-risk,” and “danger.” A multi-criteria quality assessment method is first introduced. Several transient indicators are then proposed as assessment criteria. To select the effective indicators for assessment, correlation mining using univariate regression analysis is performed between each indicator and a critical clearance time (CCT)-based stability index. The fuzzy sets of indicators for different stability levels are then determined according to their correlations with the stability index. The weighting factors of indicators are also allocated according to their regression error in correlation mining. The proposed inference scheme is further demonstrated and its effectiveness is validated in case studies on IEEE 68-bus system and a 756-bus transmission system in China.

[1]  K. L. Lo,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of power system transient stability level based on steady-state data , 1997 .

[2]  Peter Crossley,et al.  Rotor angle instability prediction using post-disturbance voltage trajectories , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[3]  I. Kamwa,et al.  PMU-Based Vulnerability Assessment Using Wide- Area Severity Indices and Tracking Modal Analysis , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[4]  S.M. Rovnyak,et al.  Integral square generator angle index for stability ranking and control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Mohsen Mohammadi Alamuti,et al.  Transient stability analysis using potential energy indices for determining critical generator sets , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[6]  Miao He,et al.  Online dynamic security assessment with missing pmu measurements: A data mining approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Liu Jun-Yong,et al.  Multi-performance criterion evaluation for severe disturbance screening regarding transient impacts , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Power System Technology.

[8]  Janath Geeganage,et al.  Application of energy-based power system features for dynamic security assessment , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[9]  Miao He,et al.  Robust Online Dynamic Security Assessment Using Adaptive Ensemble Decision-Tree Learning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Carson W. Taylor,et al.  Definition and Classification of Power System Stability , 2004 .

[11]  Udaya Annakkage,et al.  Support vector machine-based algorithm for post-fault transient stability status prediction using synchronized measurements , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[12]  Eduard Muljadi,et al.  Angle Instability Detection in Power Systems With High-Wind Penetration Using Synchrophasor Measurements , 2013, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics.

[13]  Soheil Ranjbar,et al.  Transient Instability Prediction Using Decision Tree Technique , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  P.E. Mercado,et al.  Online Inference of the Dynamic Security Level of Power Systems Using Fuzzy Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Anjan Bose,et al.  Contingency ranking based on severity indices in dynamic security analysis , 1999 .

[16]  U. D. Annakkage,et al.  Prediction of the Transient Stability Boundary Using the Lasso , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Zhe Chen,et al.  A Systematic Approach for Dynamic Security Assessment and the Corresponding Preventive Control Scheme Based on Decision Trees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.