Prediction Error Method (PEM)-Based Howling Cancellation in Hearing Aids: Can We Do Better?

This work develops an effective technique acoustic feedback cancellation (AFC) in the digital hearing aid (DHAid) devices. The normalized least mean square (NLMS) algorithm-based AFC method may suffer from a biased convergence. The biased convergence problem is considerably resolved by the prediction error method (PEM)-based AFC (PEM-AFC); however, it may demonstrate a slow convergence. The proposed method’s main structure is based two adaptive filters. The main adaptive AFC filter receives its input from the DHAid receiver signal, while the auxiliary AFC filter is activated by a probe signal. The main idea is to apply a lattice filtering-based pre-processing for decorrelation in the main AFC filter’s update equation. This produces a Newton-like adaptive algorithm with fast convergence. Additionally, the lattice filtering is executed on a sample-by-sample basis, in contrast to the frame-based execution in the traditional PEM-AFC method. As the AFC system converges, the level of the probe signal is decreased to improve the output SNR; however, the low-level input signal slows down auxiliary AFC filter’s convergence. In order to improve the convergence speed, the gradient information from a maximum Versoria-criterion (MVC) is incorporated into the auxiliary AFC filter’s update algorithm. The two adaptive filters’ coefficients are exchanged, to ensure that both adaptive filters converge to a good estimate of the true acoustic feedback path. Simulations show that the proposed method works well for speech/signals and for DHAid devices with different gain settings. Additionally, the proposed method shows robust performance in the event of a sudden change in the acoustic environment.

[1]  Felix Albu,et al.  Maximum Versoria-criterion (MVC)-based adaptive filtering method for mitigating acoustic feedback in hearing-aid devices , 2021 .

[2]  Roberto Gil-Pita,et al.  Linear detector and neural networks in cascade for voice activity detection in hearing aids , 2021 .

[3]  Paulo S. R. Diniz,et al.  Feature Adaptive Filtering: Exploiting Hidden Sparsity , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[4]  Muhammad Tahir Akhtar,et al.  On Reducing Effect of Acoustic Feedback in Hearing Aids By Employing Lattice Prediction and Hybrid Adaptive Filtering , 2019, 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON).

[5]  Felix Albu,et al.  Acoustic feedback cancellation in hearing aids using dual adaptive filtering and gain-controlled probe signal , 2019, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  Jean-François Dartigues,et al.  Death, Depression, Disability, and Dementia Associated With Self-reported Hearing Problems: A 25-Year Study , 2018, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  Felix Albu,et al.  The Hybrid Simplified Kalman Filter for Adaptive Feedback Cancellation , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Communications (COMM).

[8]  Hai Huyen Dam,et al.  Two-Microphone Hearing Aids Using Prediction Error Method for Adaptive Feedback Control , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[9]  Yu Tsao,et al.  SmartHear: A Smartphone-Based Remote Microphone Hearing Assistive System Using Wireless Technologies , 2018, IEEE Systems Journal.

[10]  Simon Doclo,et al.  Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  A realtime, open-source speech-processing platform for research in hearing loss compensation , 2017, 2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers.

[12]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Adaptive Feedback Cancellation Using a Partitioned-Block Frequency-Domain Kalman Filter Approach With PEM-Based Signal Prewhitening , 2017, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[13]  Akinori Nishihara,et al.  Lattice adaptive filtering-based method for acoustic feedback cancellation in hearing aids with robustness against sudden changes in the feedback path , 2017, 2017 Eighth International Workshop on Signal Design and Its Applications in Communications (IWSDA).

[14]  Sheng Zhang,et al.  Maximum Versoria Criterion-Based Robust Adaptive Filtering Algorithm , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[15]  Akinori Nishihara,et al.  Howling and Entrainment in Hearing Aids: A Review , 2016 .

[16]  Akinori Nishihara,et al.  Automatic tuning of probe noise for continuous acoustic feedback cancelation in hearing aids , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[17]  Issa M. S. Panahi,et al.  A method of howling detection in presence of speech signal , 2016, Signal Process..

[18]  James M. Kates,et al.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI) , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[19]  H. Amièva,et al.  Self‐Reported Hearing Loss, Hearing Aids, and Cognitive Decline in Elderly Adults: A 25‐Year Study , 2015, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  Rainer Martin,et al.  Two-Stage Filter-Bank System for Improved Single-Channel Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[21]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Wiener variable step size and gradient spectral variance smoothing for double-talk-robust acoustic echo cancellation and acoustic feedback cancellation , 2014, Signal Process..

[22]  James M. Kates,et al.  The Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) Version 2 , 2014 .

[23]  Wei-Yong Yan,et al.  Feedback Cancellation With Probe Shaping Compensation , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[24]  Akinori Nishihara,et al.  Acoustic feedback neutralization in digital hearing aids — A two adaptive filters-based solution , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS2013).

[25]  Jesper Jensen,et al.  Novel Acoustic Feedback Cancellation Approaches in Hearing Aid Applications Using Probe Noise and Probe Noise Enhancement , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[26]  David M. Simpson,et al.  Objective Prediction of the Sound Quality of Music Processed by an Adaptive Feedback Canceller , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[27]  Wei-Yong Yan,et al.  Dual microphone solution for acoustic feedback cancellation for assistive listening , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[28]  James M. Kates,et al.  The Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) , 2010 .

[29]  John A. Albertini,et al.  Deafness and Hearing Loss , 2010 .

[30]  Roberto Gil-Pita,et al.  Modified LMS-Based Feedback-Reduction Subsystems in Digital Hearing Aids Based on WOLA Filter Bank , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[31]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Robust and Efficient Implementation of the PEM-AFROW Algorithm for Acoustic Feedback Cancellation , 2007 .

[32]  Yi Hu,et al.  Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms , 2007, Speech Commun..

[33]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[34]  Martin Hansen,et al.  Objectively measured and subjectively perceived distortion in nonlinear systems. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids , 2006, J. Frankl. Inst..

[36]  M. Moonen,et al.  Acoustic feedback cancellation for long acoustic paths using a nonstationary source model , 2006, 2005 13th European Signal Processing Conference.

[37]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Performance measurement in blind audio source separation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[38]  M. Moonen,et al.  Adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids with linear prediction of the desired signal , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[39]  Sergei Kochkin,et al.  MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age , 2005 .

[40]  Johan Hellgren,et al.  Analysis of feedback cancellation in hearing aids with Filtered-x LMS and the direct method of closed loop identification , 2002, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[41]  P M Zurek,et al.  Evaluation of feedback-reduction algorithms for hearing aids. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Henning Puder,et al.  Step-size control for acoustic echo cancellation filters - an overview , 2000, Signal Process..

[43]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  Steady-state analysis of continuous adaptation in acoustic feedback reduction systems for hearing-aids , 2000, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[44]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[45]  Monson H. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling , 1996 .

[46]  August Kaelin,et al.  Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: results from using frequency-domain adaptive filters , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems - ISCAS '94.

[47]  S. Douglas A family of normalized LMS algorithms , 1994, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[48]  D. K. Bustamante,et al.  Measurement and adaptive suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[49]  Pedro Pereira Rodrigues,et al.  Analysis of Acoustic Feedback Cancellation Systems based on Direct Closed-Loop Identification , 2020, Journal of Communication and Information Systems.

[50]  Wei-Yong Yan,et al.  Analysis of Two Microphone Method for Feedback Cancellation , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[51]  Simon Doclo,et al.  Feedback Control in Hearing Aids , 2008 .