Parameter Space Compression Underlies Emergent Theories and Predictive Models

Information Physics Multiparameter models, which can emerge in biology and other disciplines, are often sensitive to only a small number of parameters and robust to changes in the rest; approaches from information theory can be used to distinguish between the two parameter groups. In physics, on the other hand, one does not need to know the details at smaller length and time scales in order to understand the behavior on large scales. This hierarchy has been recognized for a long time and formalized within the renormalization group (RG) approach. Machta et al. (p. 604) explored the connection between two scales by using an information-theoretical approach based on the Fisher Information Matrix to analyze two commonly used physics models—diffusion in one dimension and the Ising model of magnetism—as the time and length scales, respectively, were progressively coarsened. The expected “stiff” parameters emerged, in agreement with RG intuition. An information-theoretical approach is used to distinguish the important parameters in two archetypical physics models. The microscopically complicated real world exhibits behavior that often yields to simple yet quantitatively accurate descriptions. Predictions are possible despite large uncertainties in microscopic parameters, both in physics and in multiparameter models in other areas of science. We connect the two by analyzing parameter sensitivities in a prototypical continuum theory (diffusion) and at a self-similar critical point (the Ising model). We trace the emergence of an effective theory for long-scale observables to a compression of the parameter space quantified by the eigenvalues of the Fisher Information Matrix. A similar compression appears ubiquitously in models taken from diverse areas of science, suggesting that the parameter space structure underlying effective continuum and universal theories in physics also permits predictive modeling more generally.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[3]  Akademii︠a︡ medit︠s︡inskikh nauk Sssr Journal of physics , 1939 .

[4]  H. Jeffreys An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[6]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[7]  E. Wigner The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences (reprint) , 1960 .

[8]  E. Parzen Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 1962 .

[9]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[10]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[11]  David Mumford,et al.  Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 1989 .

[12]  M. V. Rossum,et al.  In Neural Computation , 2022 .

[13]  Wolff,et al.  Collective Monte Carlo updating for spin systems. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[14]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[15]  George Ruppeiner,et al.  Riemannian geometry in thermodynamic fluctuation theory , 1995 .

[16]  Fisher,et al.  Critical behavior of random transverse-field Ising spin chains. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[17]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[18]  J. Cardy Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics , 1996 .

[19]  Vijay Balasubramanian,et al.  Statistical Inference, Occam's Razor, and Statistical Mechanics on the Space of Probability Distributions , 1996, Neural Computation.

[20]  C. Jarzynski Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences , 1996, cond-mat/9610209.

[21]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[22]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Methods of information geometry , 2000 .

[23]  T D Sanger,et al.  Human Arm Movements Described by a Low-Dimensional Superposition of Principal Components , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Counting probability distributions: Differential geometry and model selection , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[25]  Chuang Liu,et al.  Scaling and Renormalization , 2002 .

[26]  Irrelevant operators in the two-dimensional Ising model , 2001, cond-mat/0106372.

[27]  Achi Brandt,et al.  Inverse Monte Carlo renormalization group transformations for critical phenomena. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[28]  Dorje C. Brody,et al.  Information geometry of finite Ising models , 2003 .

[29]  K. H. Lee,et al.  The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: nerve growth factor signaling , 2004, Physical biology.

[30]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Sloppy-model universality class and the Vandermonde matrix. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[31]  Gavin E Crooks,et al.  Measuring thermodynamic length. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[32]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Optimal experimental design in an epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and down-regulation model. , 2007, IET systems biology.

[33]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Uri Alon,et al.  Simplicity in biology , 2007, Nature.

[35]  K. Gawrisch,et al.  Critical fluctuations in domain-forming lipid mixtures , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Achim Kramer,et al.  Global parameter search reveals design principles of the mammalian circadian clock , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[37]  Greg J. Stephens,et al.  Dimensionality and Dynamics in the Behavior of C. elegans , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[39]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[40]  Mark K Transtrum,et al.  Why are nonlinear fits to data so challenging? , 2009, Physical review letters.

[41]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  What is Systems Biology? , 2010, Front. Physiology.

[42]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Sloppy models, parameter uncertainty, and the role of experimental design. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.

[43]  William Bialek,et al.  Searching for simplicity in the analysis of neurons and behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[45]  Mark K Transtrum,et al.  Geometry of nonlinear least squares with applications to sloppy models and optimization. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  X. R. Wang,et al.  Relating Fisher information to order parameters. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  Francis Corson,et al.  Geometry, epistasis, and developmental patterning , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Ricky Chachra,et al.  Structural susceptibility and separation of time scales in the van der Pol oscillator. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  Mazyar Mirrahimi,et al.  Parameter Space Compression Underlies Emergent Theories and Predictive Models , 2013 .

[50]  Kathy P. Wheeler,et al.  Reviews of Modern Physics , 2013 .

[51]  David J. Schwab,et al.  An exact mapping between the Variational Renormalization Group and Deep Learning , 2014, ArXiv.

[52]  HE Ixtroductiont,et al.  The Bell System Technical Journal , 2022 .

[53]  October I Physical Review Letters , 2022 .