Discrete–element modelling: methods and applications in the environmental sciences

This paper introduces a Theme Issue on discrete–element modelling, based on research presented at an interdisciplinary workshop on this topic organized by the National Institute of Environmental e–Science. The purpose of the workshop, and this collection of papers, is to highlight the opportunities for environmental scientists provided by (primarily) off–lattice methods in the discrete–element family, and to draw on the experiences of research communities in which the use of these methods is more advanced. Applications of these methods may be conceived in a wide range of situations where dynamic processes involve a series of fundamental entities (particles or elements) whose interaction results in emergent macroscale structures. Indeed, the capacity of these methods to reveal emergent properties at the meso– and macroscale, that reflect microscale interactions, is a significant part of their attraction. They assist with the definition of constitutive material properties at scales beyond those at which measurement and theory have been developed, and help us to understand self–organizing behaviours. The paper discusses technical issues including the contact models required to represent collision behaviour, computational aspects of particle tracking and collision detection, and scales at which experimental data are required and choices about modelling style must be made. It then illustrates the applicability of DEM and other forms of individual–based modelling in environmental and related fields as diverse as mineralogy, geomaterials, mass movement and fluvial sediment transport processes, as well as developments in ecology, zoology and the human sciences where the relationship between individual behaviour and group dynamics can be explored using a partially similar methodological framework.

[1]  J-P Latham,et al.  Some computational and algorithmic developments in computational mechanics of discontinua , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Julia K. Morgan,et al.  Numerical simulations of granular shear zones using the distinct element method: 2. Effects of particle size distribution and interparticle friction on mechanical behavior , 1999 .

[3]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[4]  G.G.W. Mustoe,et al.  Material Flow Analyses of Noncircular-Shaped Granular Media Using Discrete Element Methods , 2001 .

[5]  S. Tait,et al.  Sediment transport over a flat bed in a unidirectional flow: simulations and validation , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Tony Curzon Price,et al.  Emergence: From Chaos to Order by John H. Holland , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[7]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Emergence in social simulation , 1995 .

[8]  I. Halliday,et al.  A many–component lattice Boltzmann equation simulation for transport of deformable particles , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[10]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Spatially explicit, individual-based, behavioural models of the annual cycle of two migratory goose populations , 2000 .

[11]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Quasi-static shear deformation of a soft particle system , 2000 .

[12]  S. Levin,et al.  Scaling from Trees to Forests: Analysis of a Complex Simulation Model , 1997 .

[13]  James P. Bennett,et al.  Interparticle collision of natural sediment grains in water , 2001 .

[14]  N. Gilbert,et al.  Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life , 1995 .

[15]  D T Gethin,et al.  Using a deformable discrete–element technique to model the compaction behaviour of mixed ductile and brittle particulate systems , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  P. Cleary,et al.  Large-scale landslide simulations : global deformation, velocities and basal friction , 1995 .

[17]  V. Grimm Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[18]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[19]  I T Todorov,et al.  DL_POLY_3: the CCP5 national UK code for molecular–dynamics simulations , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Timothy A. Kohler,et al.  Dynamics in human and primate societies: agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes , 2000 .

[21]  U. Tüzün,et al.  Analysis of the evolution of granular stress—strain and voidage states based on DEM simulations , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  A. Munjiza,et al.  The modelling of particle systems with real shapes , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  R. P. Young,et al.  Simulation of Unstable Fault Slip in Granite Using a Bonded-particle Model , 2002 .

[24]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[25]  Mahesh Prakash,et al.  Discrete–element modelling and smoothed particle hydrodynamics: potential in the environmental sciences , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  Francisco Cardoso,et al.  DEM simulation of wave propagation in granular materials , 2000 .

[27]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  ERROR PROPAGATION IN A FOREST SUCCESSION MODEL:THE ROLE OF FINE‐SCALE HETEROGENEITY IN LIGHT , 1999 .

[28]  James H. Lever,et al.  Three-Dimensional Simulation of River Ice Jams , 1996 .

[29]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[30]  Marcus I. Bursik,et al.  A smoothed-particle hydrodynamic automaton of landform degradation by overland flow , 2003 .

[31]  Mark W. Schmeeckle,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of bedload transport using a local, dynamic boundary condition , 2003 .

[32]  Joseph Calantoni,et al.  Modelling sheet–flow sediment transport in wave–bottom boundary layers using discrete–element modelling , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[33]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[34]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Computational studies of granular mixing , 2000 .

[35]  U Tüzün,et al.  Discrete–element method simulations: from micro to macro scales , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  Robert J. Allison,et al.  Modelling failure mechanisms to explain rock slope change along the Isle of Purbeck coast, UK , 1998 .

[37]  K. Kendall,et al.  Atomistic studies of surface adhesions using molecular–dynamics simulations , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  E. Salje,et al.  Impact of self-irradiation damage on the aqueous durability of zircon(ZrSiO4):implications for its suitability as a nuclear waste form , 2003 .

[39]  Jpk Seville,et al.  The influence of DEM simulation parameters on the particle behaviour in a V-mixer , 2002 .

[40]  E. Salje,et al.  Structural changes in zircon under α-decay irradiation , 2002 .

[41]  J. Monaghan Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[42]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[43]  T. G. Drake,et al.  Discrete particle model for sheet flow sediment transport in the nearshore , 2001 .

[44]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[45]  W. Han,et al.  Modeling salinity distributions in the Indian Ocean , 2001 .

[46]  J. Doran,et al.  Distributed artificial intelligence and the modelling of socio-cultural systems , 1989 .

[47]  Y. Shoham Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems , 2002 .

[48]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology , 1992 .

[49]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[50]  Andreas Huth,et al.  The effects of tree species grouping in tropical rainforest modelling: Simulations with the individual-based model Formind , 1998 .

[51]  M. Louge,et al.  Inelastic microstructure in rapid granular flows of smooth disks , 1991 .

[52]  A. Munjiza The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method: Munjiza/Discrete Element Method , 2004 .

[53]  J. Morgan,et al.  Numerical simulations of granular shear zones using the distinct element method: 1. Shear zone kinematics and the micromechanics of localization , 1999 .

[54]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Using spatio-temporal chaos and intermediate-scale determinism to quantify spatially extended ecosystems , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Daniel M. Hanes,et al.  Simulations and physical measurements of glass spheres flowing down a bumpy incline , 2000 .

[56]  H. Shen,et al.  Simulation of pancake-ice dynamics in a wave field , 2001, Annals of Glaciology.

[57]  A. Munjiza The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method , 2004 .

[58]  P. Lissaman,et al.  Formation Flight of Birds , 1970, Science.