Accuracy of High-Altitude Photogrammetric Point Clouds in Mapping

During the past decade, airborne laser scanning (ALS) has established its status as the state-of-the-art method for detailed forest mapping and monitoring. Current operational forest inventory widely utilizes ALS-based methods. Recent advances in sensor technology and image processing have enabled the extraction of dense point clouds from digital stereo imagery (DSI). Compared with ALS data, the DSI-based data are cheap and the point cloud densities can easily reach that of ALS. In terms of point density, even the high-altitude DSI-based point clouds can be sufficient for detecting individual tree crowns. However, there are significant differences in the characteristics of ALS and DSI point clouds that likely affect the accuracy of tree detection. In this study, the performance of high-altitude DSI point clouds was compared with low-density ALS in detecting individual trees. The trees were extracted from DSI- and ALS-based canopy height models (CHM) using watershed segmentation. The use of both smoothed and unsmoothed CHMs was tested. The results show that, even though the spatial resolution of the DSI-based CHM was better, in terms of detecting the trees and the accuracy of height estimates, the low-density ALS performed better. However, utilizing DSI with shorter ground sample distance (GSD) and more suitable image matching algorithms would likely enhance the accuracy of DSI-based approach.

[1]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update , 2013 .

[2]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment , 2015 .

[3]  Mikko Inkinen,et al.  A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  DETECTING AND ESTIMATING ATTRIBUTES FOR SINGLE TREES USING LASER SCANNER , 2006 .

[5]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Forest variable estimation using a high-resolution digital surface model , 2012 .

[6]  Cédric Véga,et al.  Measuring individual tree height using a combination of stereophotogrammetry and lidar , 2004 .

[7]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The Utility of Image-Based Point Clouds for Forest Inventory: A Comparison with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2013 .

[8]  F. Ackermann Airborne laser scanning : present status and future expectations , 1999 .

[9]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Performance of dense digital surface models based on image matching in the estimation of plot-level forest variables , 2013 .

[10]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Penalized discriminant analysis of in situ hyperspectral data for conifer species recognition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  I. Korpela Individual tree measurements by means of digital aerial photogrammetry , 2004, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[12]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest , 2011 .

[13]  Thomas E. Burk,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Model Selection Procedures for Diameter Distribution Models , 1988, Forest Science.

[14]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[15]  M. Maltamo,et al.  ADAPTIVE METHODS FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE DETECTION ON AIRBORNE LASER BASED CANOPY HEIGHT MODEL , 2004 .

[16]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[17]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[18]  Heiko Hirschmüller,et al.  Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[20]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[21]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Outlook for the Next Generation’s Precision Forestry in Finland , 2014 .

[22]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2008 .

[23]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[24]  A. Held,et al.  High resolution mapping of tropical mangrove ecosystems using hyperspectral and radar remote sensing , 2003 .

[25]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  A method for linking field-surveyed and aerial-detected single trees using cross correlation of position images and the optimization of weighted tree list graphs. , 2008 .

[26]  HirschmullerHeiko Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008 .

[27]  B. Koch,et al.  Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar data , 2006 .

[28]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Change Detection Techniques for Canopy Height Growth Measurements Using Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 2006 .

[29]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .