The domain-within-domain packing of euchromatin can be described as multiplicative cascades

The genome is packed into the cell nucleus in the form of chromatin. Biochemical approaches have revealed that chromatin is packed within domains, which group into larger domains, and so forth. Such domain-within-domain packing, also called hierarchical packing, is equally visible in super-resolution microscopy images of large-scale chromatin organization. While previous work has suggested that chromatin is partitioned into distinct domains via microphase separation, it is unclear how these domains organize into a hierarchical packing. A particular challenge is to find an image analysis approach that fully incorporates such hierarchical packing, so that hypothetical governing mechanisms of euchromatin packing can be compared against the results of such an analysis. Here, we obtain 3D STED super-resolution images from pluripotent zebrafish embryos labeled with improved DNA fluorescence stains, and demonstrate how the hierarchical packing of euchromatin in these images can be described as multiplicative cascades. Multiplicative cascades are an established theoretical concept to describe the placement of ever-smaller structures within bigger structures. Importantly, these cascades can generate artificial image data by applying a single rule again and again, and can be fully specified using only four parameters. Here, we show how the typical patterns of euchromatin organization are reflected in the values of these four parameters. In particular, we can pinpoint the values required to mimic a microphase-separated configuration of euchromatin. We suspect that the concept of multiplicative cascades can also be applied to images of other types of chromatin. In particular, cascade parameters could serve as test quantities to assess whether microphase separation or other theoretical models accurately reproduce the hierarchical packing of chromatin. SIGNIFICANCE DNA is stored inside the cell nucleus in the form of chromatin. Chromatin exhibits a striking three-dimensional organization, where small domains group into larger domains, which again group into larger domains, and so forth. While this hierarchical domain-within-domain organization is obvious from microscopy images, it is still not entirely clear how it is established, or how it should be properly characterized. Here, we demonstrate that multiplicative cascades – a concept from theoretical physics used to characterize for example cloud patterns, galaxy locations, or soil patterns – are also ideally suited to describe the domain-within-domain organization of chromatin. This description is rather simple, using only four numbers, and can thus facilitate testing of competing theories for the domain-within-domain organization of chromatin.

[1]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  The 4D nucleome: Evidence for a dynamic nuclear landscape based on co‐aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments , 2015, FEBS letters.

[2]  M. Tomita,et al.  Dynamic organization of chromatin domains revealed by super-resolution live-cell imaging , 2017 .

[3]  Antje Sommer,et al.  Theory Of Simple Liquids , 2016 .

[4]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  THE MULTIFRACTAL SCALING OF CLOUD RADIANCES FROM 1M TO 1KM , 2002 .

[5]  L. Mirny,et al.  Formation of Chromosomal Domains in Interphase by Loop Extrusion , 2015, bioRxiv.

[6]  Neucimar J. Leite,et al.  The Fractal Dimension of Nuclear Chromatin as a Prognostic Factor in Acute Precursor B Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2006, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[7]  T. Misteli The Self-Organizing Genome: Principles of Genome Architecture and Function , 2020, Cell.

[8]  Mario Nicodemi,et al.  Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Lebedev,et al.  Fractal nature of chromatin organization in interphase chicken erythrocyte nuclei: DNA structure exhibits biphasic fractal properties , 2005, FEBS letters.

[10]  R. van de Weygaert,et al.  Clustering paradigms and multifractal measures , 1990 .

[11]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[12]  G. Nienhaus,et al.  Super-resolution imaging of densely packed DNA in nuclei of zebrafish embryos using stimulated emission double depletion microscopy , 2019, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics.

[13]  Nonequilibrium Theory of Epigenomic Microphase Separation in the Cell Nucleus , 2019 .

[14]  Anthony J. Roberts,et al.  Unbiased estimation of multi-fractal dimensions of finite data sets , 1996, chao-dyn/9601019.

[15]  M. Teubner,et al.  Origin of the scattering peak in microemulsions , 1987 .

[16]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[17]  H. Kimura,et al.  Transcription organizes euchromatin similar to an active microemulsion , 2017 .

[18]  D. Jost,et al.  Epigenomics in 3D: importance of long-range spreading and specific interactions in epigenomic maintenance , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Molecular crowding affects diffusion and binding of nuclear proteins in heterochromatin and reveals the fractal organization of chromatin , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[20]  H. Kimura,et al.  Transcription establishes microenvironments that organize euchromatin , 2017, bioRxiv.

[21]  D. Schertzer,et al.  Multifractal simulations and analysis of clouds by multiplicative processes , 1988 .

[22]  K. Bystricky,et al.  Formation of correlated chromatin domains at nanoscale dynamic resolution during transcription , 2017, bioRxiv.

[23]  K. Neugebauer,et al.  Activation of transcription enforces the formation of distinct nuclear bodies in zebrafish embryos , 2017, RNA biology.

[24]  M. Garcia-Parajo,et al.  Chromatin Fibers Are Formed by Heterogeneous Groups of Nucleosomes In Vivo , 2015, Cell.

[25]  A. Pombo,et al.  Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[26]  Diffusion-limited aggregation on multifractal lattices: A model for fluid-fluid displacement in porous media. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[27]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  The role of topological constraints in the kinetics of collapse of macromolecules , 1988 .

[28]  U Valentin Nägerl,et al.  STED nanoscopy of actin dynamics in synapses deep inside living brain slices. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[29]  B. Bruneau,et al.  Regulation of single-cell genome organization into TADs and chromatin nanodomains , 2020, Nature Genetics.

[30]  L. Mirny,et al.  Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  L. Mirny The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell , 2011, Chromosome Research.

[32]  D. Marenduzzo,et al.  Bridging-induced microphase separation: photobleaching experiments, chromatin domains and the need for active reactions. , 2020, Briefings in functional genomics.

[33]  Sébastien Phan,et al.  ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells , 2017, Science.

[34]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Cell cycle dynamics of chromosomal organisation at single-cell resolution , 2016 .

[35]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  A. Posadas,et al.  Multifractal Characterization of Soil Pore Systems , 2003 .

[37]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  The influence of volume exclusion by chromatin on the time required to find specific DNA binding sites by diffusion , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Elsa Arcaute,et al.  Multifractal methodology , 2016, 1606.02957.

[39]  Z. Lewis,et al.  The maternal to zygotic transition regulates genome-wide heterochromatin establishment in the zebrafish embryo , 2019, Nature communications.

[40]  Leonid A. Mirny,et al.  Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states , 2015, Nature.

[41]  J. Dekker,et al.  Mechanisms and Functions of Chromosome Compartmentalization. , 2020, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[42]  Ignacio Izeddin,et al.  Single cell correlation fractal dimension of chromatin , 2014, Nucleus.