Energy Decisions in an Uncertain Climate and Technology Outlook: How Stochastic and Robust Methodologies Can Assist Policy-Makers

Uncertain conditions may deeply affect the relevance of deterministic solutions proposed by optimization or equilibrium models as well as leave the decision maker in a quandary at the moment of defining policy. This chapter presents two applications of stochastic programming and robust optimization to climate and energy decisions using respectively TIAM-WORLD at the global level and MIRET in the case of France. At the global level, stochastic analysis demonstrates that the hedging strategy usually presents a smoother technology transition and is not equivalent to an average of deterministic solutions. Combined with a parametric analysis of the probability of the future outlooks, the approach produces a hedging strategy where the energy system prepares early for high mitigation even in the case of a low probability for such an outcome. Moreover, some technologies appear to be particularly appealing since they penetrate more in the hedging than in deterministic strategies; the penetration of gas power without carbon capture and sequestration in China, coal power plants with carbon capture in India, renewable electricity in Central and South America are examples of these “super-hedging” choices. In the case of the French transportation sector, robust optimization illustrates the crucial role of biofuels as a robust mitigation strategy in both moderate and severe emission reduction cases.

[1]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[2]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  Deterministic and stochastic analysis of alternative climate targets under differentiated cooperation regimes , 2009 .

[3]  Allen L. Soyster,et al.  Technical Note - Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming , 1973, Oper. Res..

[4]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[5]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions , 2009 .

[6]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Preface and introduction to EMF 27 , 2014, Climatic Change.

[7]  Jean-Philippe Vial,et al.  Deriving robust counterparts of nonlinear uncertain inequalities , 2012, Math. Program..

[8]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[9]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust optimization – methodology and applications , 2002, Math. Program..

[10]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  A Robust Optimization Approach to Inventory Theory , 2006, Oper. Res..

[11]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[12]  Jean-Philippe Vial,et al.  Energy Security: A Robust Optimization Approach to Design a Robust European Energy Supply via TIAM-WORLD , 2012, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[13]  Amit Kanudia,et al.  Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: The case of Québec , 1996, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  M. H. Duong,et al.  Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies , 2014 .

[15]  J Figueira,et al.  Stochastic Programming , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[17]  R. Loulou,et al.  Climate mitigation under an uncertain technology future: A TIAM-World analysis , 2012 .

[18]  Ekundayo Shittu,et al.  Uncertainty and endogenous technical change in climate policy models , 2008 .

[19]  Gary Yohe,et al.  To Hedge or Not Against an Uncertain Climate Future? , 2004, Science.

[20]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in a Large Scale Integrated Energy-Climate Model , 2009 .

[21]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure , 2008, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[22]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[23]  Richard Loulou,et al.  ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model. part II: mathematical formulation , 2008, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[24]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Robust Solutions to Uncertain Semidefinite Programs , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[25]  Jeffrey M. Keisler,et al.  Uncertainty, Technical Change, and Policy Models , 2007 .

[26]  Amit Kanudia,et al.  Minimax regret strategies for greenhouse gas abatement: methodology and application , 1997, Oper. Res. Lett..

[27]  D. Lorne The French biofuels mandates under cost uncertainty - an assessment based on robust optimization è Draft paper , 2012 .