Exploring the environmental impact assessment commissioners' perspectives on the development of the seawater desalination project

Abstract In recent years, extreme climate conditions have resulted in uneven precipitations in Taiwan. The development of traditional water resources frequently suffers from protests of environmental groups, potential dam sites being hard-to-find, and other factors. The development of new water sources has been increasingly difficult. Sea water desalination has the advantages of a short construction time and easy expansion flexibility, making it an important alternative as a new water resource. In this study, the current proposal of Tainan's desalination plant was used as an example. Qualitative interviews and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to explore the environmental impact assessment (EIA) commissioner's perceptions of the impact from the development of the desalination project. The results of the qualitative interview indicate that the main concerns of the EIA commissioners are whether the development could damage the marine ecological environment and its fishery resources, which may have adverse socioeconomic consequences. The AHP results show that the commissioners' priority of environmental impact is ecological environmental impact 36.9%, social impact 29.7%, economic impact 23.7%, and physical and chemical environmental impact 9.7%. The main concerns in each impact category are, respectively, marine ecological environment, land and ocean utilisation, fisheries, and air quality.

[1]  Gurudeo Anand Tularam,et al.  Environmental concerns of desalinating seawater using reverse osmosis. , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[2]  M. Zadoroznyj,et al.  How Australians order acceptance of recycled water , 2008 .

[3]  F. Helfer,et al.  Bridging the Water Supply–demand Gap in Australia: Coupling Water Demand Efficiency with Rain-independent Desalination Supply , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[4]  G. V. Medeazza.  “Direct” and socially-induced environmental impacts of desalination , 2005 .

[5]  Nikolay Voutchkov.  Salinity tolerance evaluation methodology for desalination plant discharge , 2009 .

[6]  Q. Schiermeier.  Water: Purification with a pinch of salt , 2008, Nature.

[7]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Direct potable reuse: a future imperative , 2011 .

[8]  M. Latorre.  Environmental impact of brine disposal on Posidonia seagrasses , 2005 .

[9]  T. Höpner,et al.  Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination , 2008 .

[10]  S. Lattemann,et al.  Chemical impacts from seawater desalination plants — a case study of the northern Red Sea☆ , 2003 .

[11]  José Luis Fuentes-Bargues,et al.  Analysis of the process of environmental impact assessment for seawater desalination plants in Spain , 2014 .

[12]  Javier Romero,et al.  Salinity tolerance of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica: recommendations to minimize the impact of brine discharges from desalination plants , 2008 .

[13]  E. Macpherson,et al.  Effect of brine discharge from a desalination plant on macrobenthic communities in the NW Mediterranean. , 2006, Marine environmental research.

[14]  U. Yermiyahu,et al.  Rethinking Desalinated Water Quality and Agriculture , 2007, Science.

[15]  Ta-Kang Liu,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of seawater desalination plant under the framework of integrated coastal management , 2013 .

[16]  Ta-Kang Liu,et al.  Influence of waste management policy on the characteristics of beach litter in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[17]  Gene L. Theodori,et al.  Public Perception of Desalinated Water from Oil and Gas Field Operations: Data from Texas , 2009 .

[18]  A. Angelakis,et al.  Desalination Technologies: Hellenic Experience , 2014 .

[19]  Beverley Clarke,et al.  How robust is the environmental impact assessment process in South Australia? Behind the scenes of the Adelaide seawater desalination project , 2013 .

[20]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Environmental and natural resource economics. , 2018 .

[21]  P. K. Abdul Azis,et al.  Chlorophyll and plankton of the Gulf coastal waters of Saudi Arabia bordering a desalination plant , 2003 .

[22]  Rodney Anthony Stewart,et al.  Long-term water supply planning in an Australian coastal city: Dams or desalination? , 2015 .

[23]  S. Dolnicar,et al.  What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? , 2011, Water research.

[24]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[25]  D. Davis Case,et al.  The community's toolbox. The idea, methods and tools for participatory assessment, monitoring and evaluation in community forestry , 1990 .

[26]  Sorada Tapsuwan,et al.  Drivers of an urban community's acceptance of a large desalination scheme for drinking water , 2015 .

[27]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[28]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2000 .

[29]  Kevin O'Toole,et al.  Public perceptions of, and responses to, desalination in Australia : a report on findings , 2012 .

[30]  Alon Tal,et al.  Seeking Sustainability: Israel's Evolving Water Management Strategy , 2006, Science.

[31]  Sara Dolnicar,et al.  Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  L. Crowder,et al.  Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning , 2012 .

[33]  Rashad Danoun.  Desalination plants: Potential impacts of brine discharge on marine life , 2007 .

[34]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .