Bridging the gap between IMRT and VMAT: dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE To propose an alternative radiation therapy (RT) planning and delivery scheme with optimal angular beam sampling and intrabeam modulation for improved dose distribution while maintaining high delivery efficiency. METHODS In the proposed approach, coined as dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated RT (DASSIM-RT), a large number of beam angles are used to increase the angular sampling, leading to potentially more conformal dose distributions as compared to conventional IMRT. At the same time, intensity modulation of the incident beams is simplified to eliminate the dispensable segments, compensating the increase in delivery time caused by the increased number of beams and facilitating the plan delivery. In a sense, the proposed approach shifts and transforms, in an optimal fashion, some of the beam segments in conventional IMRT to the added beams. For newly available digital accelerators, the DASSIM-RT delivery can be made very efficient by concatenating the beams so that they can be delivered sequentially without operator's intervention. Different from VMAT, the level of intensity modulation in DASSIS-RT is field specific and optimized to meet the need of each beam direction. Three clinical cases (a head and neck (HN) case, a pancreas case, and a lung case) are used to evaluate the proposed RT scheme. DASSIM-RT, VMAT, and conventional IMRT plans are compared quantitatively in terms of the conformality index (CI) and delivery efficiency. RESULTS Plan quality improves generally with the number and intensity modulation of the incident beams. For a fixed number of beams or fixed level of intensity modulation, the improvement saturates after the intensity modulation or number of beams reaches to a certain level. An interplay between the two variables is observed and the saturation point depends on the values of both variables. For all the cases studied here, the CI of DASSIM-RT with 15 beams and 5 intensity levels (0.90, 0.79, and 0.84 for the HN, pancreas, and lung cases, respectively) is similar with that of conventional IMRT with seven beams and ten intensity levels (0.88, 0.79, and 0.83) and is higher than that of single-arc VMAT (0.75, 0.75, and 0.82). It is also found that the DASSIM-RT plans generally have better sparing of organs-at-risk than IMRT plans. It is estimated that the dose delivery time of DASSIM-RT with 15 beams and 5 intensity levels is about 4.5, 4.4, and 4.2 min for the HN, pancreas, and lung case, respectively, similar to that of IMRT plans with 7 beams and 10 intensity levels. CONCLUSION DASSIS-RT bridges the gap between IMRT and VMAT and allows optimal sampling of angular space and intrabeam modulation, thus it provides improved conformity in dose distributions while maintaining high delivery efficiency.

[1]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[3]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a robust optimization method for IMRT of moving targets. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  G. Mageras,et al.  Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  J O Deasy,et al.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical physics.

[6]  Tae-Suk Suh,et al.  Multisource modeling of flattening filter free (FFF) beam and the optimization of model parameters. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  L. Xing,et al.  Dose-volume based ranking of incident beam direction and its utility in facilitating IMRT beam placement. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  R. Garcia,et al.  Evaluation dosimétrique d'une radiothérapie conformationnelle: le facteur de conformation , 2000 .

[9]  R. Mohan,et al.  Optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans based on the equivalent uniform dose. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Steve Webb,et al.  Single-Arc IMRT? , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Lei Xing,et al.  Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. , 2003, Medical physics.

[14]  Tae-Suk Suh,et al.  Inverse planning for IMRT with nonuniform beam profiles using total-variation regularization (TVR). , 2011, Medical physics.

[15]  B. Chauvet,et al.  [Dosimetric evaluation of conformal radiotherapy: conformity factor]. , 2000, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[16]  Tae-Suk Suh,et al.  Beam's-eye-view Dosimetrics-guided inverse planning for aperture-modulated arc therapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  L. Xing,et al.  Aperture modulated arc therapy. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  A non-voxel-based broad-beam (NVBB) framework for IMRT treatment planning , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  L. Xing,et al.  Iterative methods for inverse treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  C. Cotrutz,et al.  Segment-based dose optimization using a genetic algorithm. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  A. Niemierko Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. , 1997, Medical physics.

[22]  Yair Censor,et al.  The dose–volume constraint satisfaction problem for inverse treatment planning with field segments , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Temporo-spatial IMRT optimization: concepts, implementation and initial results , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Vikren Sarkar,et al.  Rotational IMRT delivery using a digital linear accelerator in very high dose rate 'burst mode'. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  D M Shepard,et al.  Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. , 2002, Medical physics.