Estimation of cross-bridge stiffness from maximum thermodynamic efficiency

In muscle, work is performed by myosin cross-bridges during interactions with actin filaments. The amount of work performed during each interaction can be related to the mechanical properties of the cross-bridge; work is the integral of the force produced with respect to the distance that the cross-bridge moves the actin filament, and force is determined by the stiffness of the attached cross-bridge. In this paper, cross-bridge stiffness in frog sartorius muscle was estimated from thermodynamic efficiency (work/free energy change) using a two-state cross-bridge model, assuming constant stiffness over the working range and tight-coupling between cross- bridge cycles and ATP use. This model accurately predicts mechanical efficiency (work/enthalpy output). A critical review of the literature indicates that a realistic value for maximum thermodynamic efficiency of frog sartorius is 0.45 under conditions commonly used in experiments on isolated muscle. Cross-bridge stiffness was estimated for a range of power stroke amplitudes. For realistic amplitudes (10–15nm), estimated cross-bridge stiffness was between 1 and 2.2pNnm−1. These values are similar to those estimated from quick-release experiments, taking into account compliance arising from structures other than cross-bridges, but are substantially higher than those from isolated protein studies. The effects on stiffness estimates of relaxing the tight-coupling requirement and of incorporating more force-producing cross-bridge states are also considered.

[1]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[2]  A. Hill,et al.  An examination of absolute values in myothermic measurements , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Hill The effect of load on the heat of shortening of muscle , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  A. Hill The efficiency of mechanical power development during muscular shortening and its relation to load , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  R. Woledge The energetics of tortoise muscle , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Davies,et al.  The chemical energetics of muscle contraction. II. The chemistry, efficiency and power of maximally working sartorius muscles , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  M J Kushmerick,et al.  The chemical energetics of muscle contraction I. Activation heat, heat of shortening and ATP utilization for activation-relaxation processes , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  A. Huxley,et al.  Proposed Mechanism of Force Generation in Striated Muscle , 1971, Nature.

[9]  A. Huxley,et al.  A note suggesting that the cross-bridge attachment during muscle contraction may take place in two stages , 1973, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  D R Wilkie,et al.  The effect of the performance of work on total energy output and metabolism during muscular contraction , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  A. Huxley,et al.  Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E. Homsher,et al.  Skeletal muscle energetics and metabolism. , 1978, Annual review of physiology.

[13]  D. Wilkie,et al.  Muscular fatigue investigated by phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance , 1978, Nature.

[14]  N. Curtin,et al.  Chemical change and energy production during contraction of frog muscle: how are their time courses related? , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  The time-course of energy balance in an isometric tetanus , 1979, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  The relation of muscle biochemistry to muscle physiology. , 1980, Annual review of physiology.

[17]  T. L. Hill,et al.  Cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Quantitative analysis. , 1980, Biophysical journal.

[18]  N. Curtin,et al.  Effect of muscle length on energy balance in frog skeletal muscle. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Energy balance studies in frog skeletal muscles shortening at one-half maximal velocity , 1984, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  N. Curtin,et al.  Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. , 1985, Monographs of the Physiological Society.

[21]  E. Homsher Muscle enthalpy production and its relationship to actomyosin ATPase. , 1987, Annual review of physiology.

[22]  L. E. Ford,et al.  The kinetics of heat production in response to active shortening in frog skeletal muscle. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  The energetics of work and heat production by single muscle fibres from the frog. , 1988, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[24]  R. Woledge,et al.  Molar enthalpy change for hydrolysis of phosphorylcreatine under conditions in muscle cells. , 1988, Biophysical journal.

[25]  D. Stephenson,et al.  Dissociation of force from myofibrillar MgATPase and stiffness at short sarcomere lengths in rat and toad skeletal muscle. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  C. Gibbs,et al.  Energetics of fast‐ and slow‐twitch muscles of the mouse. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J. Spudich,et al.  Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps , 1994, Nature.

[28]  R. Cooke,et al.  A model of the release of myosin heads from actin in rapidly contracting muscle fibers. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Y Ueno,et al.  X-ray diffraction evidence for the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments during muscle contraction. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[30]  H E Huxley,et al.  X-ray diffraction measurements of the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments in contracting muscle. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[31]  A. Huxley,et al.  Actin compliance: are you pulling my chain? , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[32]  J. Burns,et al.  Single-molecule mechanics of heavy meromyosin and S1 interacting with rabbit or Drosophila actins using optical tweezers. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[33]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Forces and steps generated by single myosin molecules. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[34]  A. Mehta,et al.  Characterization of single actin-myosin interactions. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[35]  J J Fredberg,et al.  On the theory of muscle contraction: filament extensibility and the development of isometric force and stiffness. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[36]  C. Reggiani,et al.  Chemo‐mechanical energy transduction in relation to myosin isoform composition in skeletal muscle fibres of the rat , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  K. Holmes,et al.  The structural basis of muscle contraction. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[38]  S. Tideswell,et al.  Filament compliance and tension transients in muscle , 1996, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[39]  J. Squire The actomyosin interaction — shedding light on structural events: ‘Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose’ , 1994, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[40]  Weakly-coupled models for motor enzyme function , 1995, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.