Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access: Common Myths and Critical Questions

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has received tremendous attention for the design of radio access techniques for fifth generation (5G) wireless networks and beyond. The basic concept behind NOMA is to serve more than one user in the same resource block, for example, a time slot, subcarrier, spreading code, or space. With this, NOMA promotes massive connectivity, lowers latency, improves user fairness and spectral efficiency, and increases reliability compared to orthogonal multiple access (OMA) techniques. While NOMA has gained significant attention from the communications community, it has also been subject to several widespread misunderstandings, such as "NOMA is based on allocating higher power to users with worse channel conditions. As such, cell-edge users receive more power in NOMA and due to this biased power allocation toward celledge users inter-cell interference is more severe in NOMA compared to OMA. NOMA also compromises security for spectral efficiency." The above statements are actually false, and this article aims at identifying such common myths about NOMA and clarifying why they are not true. We also pose critical questions that are important for the effective adoption of NOMA in 5G and beyond and identify promising research directions for NOMA, which will require intense investigation in the future.

[1]  Anass Benjebbour,et al.  Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Cellular Future Radio Access , 2013, 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[2]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  The Performance of Successive Interference Cancellation in Random Wireless Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Ding Zhiguo,et al.  Multiple Access Techniques for 5G , 2019 .

[4]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Nonorthogonal Multiple Access for 5G and Beyond , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Caijun Zhong,et al.  Fully Non-Orthogonal Communication for Massive Access , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Superposition Coding Strategies: Design and Experimental Evaluation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Multiple Access Techniques for 5G Wireless Networks and Beyond , 2018 .

[8]  Stephan ten Brink,et al.  Deep Learning Based Communication Over the Air , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[9]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  Interference cancellation for cellular systems: a contemporary overview , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[10]  Gerhard Bauch,et al.  Network assisted inter-cell codeword cancellation for interference-limited LTE-A and beyond , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW).

[11]  Pingzhi Fan,et al.  Impact of User Pairing on 5G Nonorthogonal Multiple-Access Downlink Transmissions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[12]  Guan Gui,et al.  Deep Learning for an Effective Nonorthogonal Multiple Access Scheme , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Yuanwei Liu,et al.  Interplay Between NOMA and Other Emerging Technologies: A Survey , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[14]  Nam-I Kim,et al.  Deep Learning-Aided SCMA , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[15]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  MIMO-NOMA Design for Small Packet Transmission in the Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Access.

[16]  Mung Chiang,et al.  Power Control in Wireless Cellular Networks , 2008, Found. Trends Netw..