Integrating Humans with Intelligent Technologies: Merging Theories of Collaborative Intelligence and Expert Cognition

Intelligent agents and agent –based software are terms that computer science researchers and developers cannot avoid. Many articles tell us how these agents are being developed, as well as what types of tasks they can automatically and autonomously undertake. For instance, your agent will negotiate with my doctor’s agent and mine to make sure that our scheduled meeting doesn’t conflict with my annual checkup. The agents will help improve performance on my job, by monitoring what I do and fail to do. As with many new developments in computer science, little effort has been devoted to researching how users will interact with this army of agents. We interact with many individuals in our work, home, and play environments. We learn the habits and skills of those we interact with frequently and integrate that information into existing knowledge about the world, such that we can anticipate their actions and better deal with changing task demands. For example, when an individual’s workload is high, or when they are ill, we maximize our workforce by off-loading, re-assigning or postponing tasks. In essence, we adapt as those around us develop new skills and undertake new tasks Will our agents be able to do the same? Will agents notice these subtle changes in demand characteristics and develop such flexible adaptation?

[1]  Elizabeth R. Stuck,et al.  Specialized Strategies: An Altenative to First Principles in Diagnostic Problem Solving , 1988, AAAI.

[2]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Generative Knowledge for Computer Troubleshooting , 1990, ECAI.

[3]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Constructing the Correct Diagnosis When Symptoms Disappear , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[4]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Integration of an Expert Teaching Assistant with Distance Learning Software , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 2.

[5]  Claudio Talarico,et al.  A unified hardware-software framework for evaluating power consumption of embedded system-on-a-chip designs , 2004 .

[6]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Interactive Simulation Environments , 1995, AI Mag..

[7]  Nancy E. Reed Diagnosing Multiple Interacting Defects with Combination Descriptions , 1994, AAAI.

[8]  Luigi Benedicenti,et al.  A system model for university course timetabling using mobile agents , 2006, Multiagent Grid Syst..

[9]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Integrating Problem-Solving Models in Common Lisp , 2005 .

[10]  U Vengfai Enhancing agent capability in a large simulation system , 2005 .

[11]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Diagnosing congenital heart defects using the Fallot computational model , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[12]  Paul Scerri,et al.  Designing agents for systems with adjustable autonomy , 2001 .

[13]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Analysis of Expert Reasoning in Hardware Diagnosis , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  Nancy E. Reed Robust Strategies for Diagnosing Manufacturing Defects , 1996, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[15]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Enhancing Agent Capabilities in a Large Rescue Simulation System , 2006 .

[16]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Heart sound analysis for symptom detection and computer-aided diagnosis , 2004, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[17]  Bin Wei Using A PCI Scheduler And A Dynamic Threshold To Enhance A High Speed Readout System , 2005 .

[18]  Mu Feng,et al.  Motion Estimation in the 3-D Gabor Domain , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Supporting Adjustable Autonomy in Agent Systems , 2005 .

[20]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  A User Controlled Approach to Adjustable Autonomy , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Luigi Benedicenti,et al.  A Mobile Agent System for University Course Timetabling , 2005, IICAI.

[22]  Eric Jönsson,et al.  Intelligent Agents in an Electronic Auction Context , 2000 .