Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game-Theoretical Investigation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Henry Prakken | Antonino Rotolo | Giovanni Sartor | Regis Riveret | G. Sartor | Régis Riveret | H. Prakken | A. Rotolo
[1] John Zeleznikow,et al. Integrating artificial intelligence, argumentation and game theory to develop an online dispute resolution environment , 2004, 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.
[2] Henry Prakken,et al. Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation , 2005, J. Log. Comput..
[3] Ariel Rubinstein,et al. A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .
[4] John Zeleznikow,et al. Representations of Decision-making Support in Negotiation , 2001, J. Decis. Syst..
[5] Henry Prakken,et al. Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes , 2007, JURIX.
[6] A. Rubinstein,et al. A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .
[7] Henry Prakken,et al. Relating Protocols For Dynamic Dispute With Logics For Defeasible Argumentation , 2000, Synthese.
[8] Guido Governatori,et al. Strategic argumentation: a game theoretical investigation , 2007, ICAIL.
[9] A. Lodder. DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation , 1999 .
[10] Phan Minh Dung,et al. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..