Processing Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: The Effect of Contextual Bias
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Susanne Gahl,et al. Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[2] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models , 2001 .
[3] Michael J. Crawley,et al. The R book , 2022 .
[4] Eric Wanner,et al. Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .
[5] Robin K. Morris,et al. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .
[6] Fernanda Ferreira,et al. Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .
[7] J. Fodor. Psychology and Language. , 1970 .
[8] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..
[9] Trevor A. Harley,et al. The psychology of language : from data to theory , 2001 .
[10] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences , 2003 .
[11] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Research design and statistical analysis, 2nd ed. , 2003 .
[12] D. Mitchell,et al. Absence of real evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2006 .
[13] Gerard Kempen,et al. In Defense of Competition During Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 2008, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[14] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Cues, Constraints, and Competition in Sentence Processing , 2004 .
[15] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[16] N. Pearlmutter,et al. Constraints on sentence comprehension , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[17] J. Henderson,et al. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[18] K. Rayner,et al. Parsing Temporarily Ambiguous Complements , 1987 .
[19] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[20] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[21] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Tracking the Continuity of Language Comprehension: Computer Mouse Trajectories Suggest Parallel Syntactic Processing , 2007, Cogn. Sci..
[22] G. Altmann. Ambiguity in sentence processing , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Falsifying Serial and Parallel Parsing Models: Empirical Conundrums and An Overlooked Paradigm , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[24] C. Clifton,et al. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[25] M. Crocker. Computational Psycholinguistics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Language , 1995 .
[26] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[27] Lyn Frazier,et al. The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .
[28] M. Pickering,et al. Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .
[29] L Frazier,et al. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[30] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .
[31] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .
[32] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements in reading words and sentences , 2007 .
[33] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Research Design and Statistical Analysis , 1991 .
[34] N J Pearlmutter,et al. Distinguishing Serial and Parallel Parsing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[35] M. Pickering,et al. Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2005 .
[36] F. Cuetos,et al. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish , 1988, Cognition.
[37] Suzanne Stevenson,et al. Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation , 1994 .
[38] Katherine S. Binder,et al. The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2001 .
[39] J. Kimball. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .
[40] M. Tanenhaus. Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures” , 2013 .
[41] G. Kempen,et al. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.
[42] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[43] Edward Gibson,et al. A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown , 1991 .
[44] K. Rayner,et al. The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. , 2001 .
[45] S. Kennison. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[46] J. Fodor,et al. The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .
[47] Adrian Staub,et al. Parallelism and Competition in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[48] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .
[49] Mark Steedman,et al. Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.
[50] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[51] Karin Humphreys,et al. The psychology of language : from data to theory , 2001 .
[52] G. Kane. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .
[53] Christopher T. Kello,et al. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[54] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[55] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts , 2000 .
[56] M. Coltheart. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .
[57] Janet D. Fodor,et al. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.
[58] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[59] M. Coltheart,et al. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology , 1985 .
[60] Weijia Ni,et al. Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities , 1996 .
[61] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[62] Michael P. Wilson,et al. Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.
[63] Adrian Staub,et al. The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[64] C. Clifton,et al. The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .
[65] Alan Garnham,et al. Late Closure in Context , 1998 .
[66] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .