Towards Adaptive Service Ecosystems with Agreement Technologies

The growing complexity of software is emphasizing the need for systems that have autonomy, robustness and adaptability among their most important features. Hence, their development and maintenance strategies must be redesigned. Humans should be relieved from an important part of these tasks, which should be performed by systems themselves; self-adaptation can be therefore considered as an architecture-level concern. Service-oriented architectures, and in particular service ecosystems as their more dynamic variant, show a higher degree of adaptivity and flexibility than many other alternatives. In this context, Agreement Technologies (AT) appears as a service-oriented, architecture-aware evolutions of Multi-Agent Systems, which themselves are self-aware structures conceived to solve generic problems. However, they still do not provide mechanisms to change their composition patterns and element types, which are necessary to achieve real self-adaptivity. This work proposes an architectural solution for it: the required dynamism will be supported by an emergent agreement - an evolving architectural structure based on combining predefined controls and protocols. These are handled in the context of the service-oriented, agent-based and organization-centric framework defined by AT, and implemented within the THOMAS platform. This work provides the first architectural abstractions to support this emergent structure. A real-world example showing the interest of this approach is also provided, and some conclusions about its applicability are finally outlined.

[1]  José Luiz Fiadeiro,et al.  Designing for software's social complexity , 2007, Computer.

[2]  Mikhail Prokopenko,et al.  An information-theoretic primer on complexity, self-organization, and emergence , 2009 .

[3]  Andres J. Ramirez,et al.  Design patterns for developing dynamically adaptive systems , 2010, SEAMS '10.

[4]  David M. Booth,et al.  Web Services Architecture , 2004 .

[5]  Anna van Raaphorst OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) , 2006 .

[6]  Sascha Ossowski,et al.  Agreement Technologies for Adaptive, Service-Oriented Multi-Agent Systems , 2009, WAT.

[7]  Pablo de la Fuente,et al.  Dynamic coordination architecture through the use of reflection , 2001, SAC.

[8]  Rogério de Lemos,et al.  Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems [outcome of a Dagstuhl Seminar] , 2009, Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems.

[9]  Mark Lycett,et al.  Service-oriented architecture , 2003, 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[11]  Sascha Ossowski,et al.  Supporting Medical Emergencies by MAS , 2009, KES-AMSTA.

[12]  Sascha Ossowski Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems: Towards a Technology of Agreement , 2008, MATES.

[13]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Modeling Dimensions of Self-Adaptive Software Systems , 2009, Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems.

[14]  Jeff Magee,et al.  Self-Managed Systems: an Architectural Challenge , 2007, Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07).

[15]  Francis G. McCabe,et al.  Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0 , 2006 .

[16]  Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.  The Vision of Autonomic Computing , 2003, Computer.

[17]  Sascha Ossowski,et al.  The Agreement as an Adaptive Architecture for Open Multi-Agent Systems , 2009 .

[18]  Alexander Galloway,et al.  Protocol, or, How Control Exists after Decentralization , 2001 .

[19]  Estefania Argente,et al.  An abstract architecture for virtual organizations: The THOMAS approach , 2011, Knowledge and Information Systems.