Optimal Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Interfacing: Applying Modern Control for Design and Verification of High-Accuracy Interfaces

In this article, we develop a novel approach to design power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) simulation interfaces that maximize simulation bandwidth and accuracy by leveraging a modern control framework that explicitly considers objectives on accuracy and can automatically synthesize an optimal controller that meets these objectives while stabilizing the closed-loop system. The method developed improves upon common approaches to PHIL interface design that typically involve multiple design steps for manual compensation and stabilization that can result in interfaces that are stable but have suboptimal bandwidth and accuracy. The approach developed is general and can be applied to most PHIL system configurations. The modeling framework allows for the inclusion of scaling factors and hardware-under-test current injection models that are common to practical PHIL simulations and have significant impacts on stability. We also present practical methods and metrics for verifying the absolute accuracy of PHIL simulation results without relying on relative comparisons to potentially inaccurate models or previous simulation results. We demonstrate the accuracy evaluation method and show the improved performance achievable when using the optimal PHIL interface design approach in an experimental case study involving a 100-kVA battery inverter.

[1]  Blake Lundstrom,et al.  Systematic Characterization of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Evaluation Platform Stability , 2019, 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[2]  Mazheruddin H. Syed,et al.  Assessment and development of stability enhancing methods for dynamically changing power hardware-in-the-loop simulations , 2019 .

[3]  Dianguo Xu,et al.  A Precise Stability Criterion for Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation System , 2019, 2019 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE 2019 - ECCE Asia).

[4]  Guoqing Li,et al.  Interface algorithm development for PHIL simulations of MMC‐HVDC devices via real‐time impedance matching , 2019, The Journal of Engineering.

[5]  Kai Strunz,et al.  A Benchmark System for Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Distributed Energy Resources , 2018, IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal.

[6]  Nathan D. Marks,et al.  Interface Compensation for Power Hardware-in-the-Loop , 2018, 2018 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE).

[7]  Nathan D. Marks,et al.  Stability of a Switched Mode Power Amplifier Interface for Power Hardware-in-the-Loop , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Ron Brandl,et al.  Operational Range of Several Interface Algorithms for Different Power Hardware-In-The-Loop Setups , 2017 .

[9]  Qiuwei Wu,et al.  Stability and accuracy considerations in the design and implementation of wind turbine power hardware in the loop platform , 2017 .

[10]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Online Parametric Identification of Power Impedances to Improve Stability and Accuracy of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Olivier Tremblay,et al.  Contribution to stability analysis of power hardware-in-the-loop simulators , 2017 .

[12]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Improving existing methods for stable and more accurate Power Hardware-in-the-Loop experiments , 2017, 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE).

[13]  Meng Huang,et al.  Improving the Stability and Accuracy of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation Using Virtual Impedance Method , 2016 .

[14]  Murali Baggu,et al.  Modeling and compensation design for a power hardware-in-the-loop simulation of an AC distribution system , 2016, 2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[15]  Anye Ren,et al.  Smith predictor based delay compensation for a hardware-in-the-loop docking simulator , 2016 .

[16]  G. M. Burt,et al.  Harmonic-by-harmonic time delay compensation method for PHIL simulation of low impedance power systems , 2015, 2015 International Symposium on Smart Electric Distribution Systems and Technologies (EDST).

[17]  E. Barocio,et al.  Phase compensation scheme to improve the accuracy of a power hardware-in-the-loop experiment based on a synchronous generator , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[18]  Felix Lehfuss,et al.  The Limitations of Digital Simulation and the Advantages of PHIL Testing in Studying Distributed Generation Provision of Ancillary Services , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  G. M. Burt,et al.  A new control method for the power interface in power hardware-in-the-loop simulation to compensate for the time delay , 2014, 2014 49th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).

[20]  Arindam Ghosh,et al.  Stability synthesis of power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) simulation , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[21]  C. S. Edrington,et al.  Improved power hardware in the loop interface methods via impedance matching , 2013, 2013 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS).

[22]  A. M. Gole,et al.  Compensating for Interface Equipment Limitations to Improve Simulation Accuracy of Real-Time Power Hardware In Loop Simulation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[23]  Alexander Viehweider,et al.  Power hardware in the loop simulation with feedback current filtering for electric systems , 2011, IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[24]  Alexander Viehweider,et al.  Stabilization of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop simulations of electric energy systems , 2011, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[25]  C Dufour,et al.  Interfacing Issues in Real-Time Digital Simulators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[26]  M. Steurer,et al.  Improve the Stability and the Accuracy of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation by Selecting Appropriate Interface Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[27]  M. Steurer,et al.  An Effective Method for Evaluating the Accuracy of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[28]  M. Steurer,et al.  Applying Controller and Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation in Designing and Prototyping Apparatuses for Future All Electric Ship , 2007, 2007 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium.

[29]  G. Narayanan,et al.  Improved Accuracy, Modeling, and Stability Analysis of Power-Hardware-in-Loop Simulation With Open-Loop Inverter as Power Amplifier , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[30]  Kai Strunz,et al.  Multirate Partitioning Interface for Enhanced Stability of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Real-Time Simulation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[31]  Karl Schoder,et al.  Characteristics and Design of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations for Electrical Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[32]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Methods for stability and accuracy evaluation of power hardware in the loop simulations , 2014 .

[33]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .