Improving Code Review Effectiveness through Reviewer Recommendations Patanamon Thongtanunam * and

[1]  Vipin Balachandran,et al.  Reducing human effort and improving quality in peer code reviews using automatic static analysis and reviewer recommendation , 2013, 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[2]  Alberto Bacchelli,et al.  Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review , 2013, 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[3]  Tim Menzies,et al.  Distributed development considered harmful? , 2013, 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[4]  Rajesh Krishna Balan,et al.  Globally distributed software development project performance: an empirical analysis , 2007, ESEC-FSE '07.

[5]  Daniel M. Germán,et al.  Cohesive and Isolated Development with Branches , 2012, FASE.

[6]  Margaret-Anne D. Storey,et al.  Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects , 2011, 2011 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[7]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  State‐of‐the‐art: software inspections after 25 years , 2002, Softw. Test. Verification Reliab..

[8]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Expertise Browser: a quantitative approach to identifying expertise , 2002, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2002.

[9]  Hajimu Iida,et al.  Who does what during a code review? Datasets of OSS peer review repositories , 2013, 2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR).