Runaway electron generation and control

We present an overview of FTU experiments on runaway electron (RE) generation and control carried out through a comprehensive set of real-time (RT) diagnostics/control systems and newly installed RE diagnostics. An RE imaging spectrometer system detects visible and infrared synchrotron radiation. A Cherenkov probe measures RE escaping the plasma. A gamma camera provides hard x-ray radial profiles from RE bremsstrahlung interactions in the plasma. Experiments on the onset and suppression of RE show that the threshold electric field for RE generation is larger than that expected according to a purely collisional theory, but consistent with an increase due to synchrotron radiation losses. This might imply a lower density to be targeted with massive gas injection for RE suppression in ITER. Experiments on active control of disruption-generated RE have been performed through feedback on poloidal coils by implementing an RT boundary-reconstruction algorithm evaluated on magnetic moments. The results indicate that the slow plasma current ramp-down and the simultaneous reduction of the reference plasma external radius are beneficial in dissipating the RE beam energy and population, leading to reduced RE interactions with plasma facing components. RE active control is therefore suggested as a possible alternative or complementary technique to massive gas injection.

[1]  Paola Batistoni,et al.  Design of the neutron multicollimator for Frascati tokamak upgrade , 1995 .

[2]  P Innocente,et al.  Two-color medium-infrared scanning interferometer for the Frascati tokamak upgrade fusion test device. , 2006, Applied optics.

[3]  J. W. Connor,et al.  Relativistic limitations on runaway electrons , 1975 .

[4]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  On the measurement of the threshold electric field for runaway electron generation in the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade , 2016 .

[5]  M. Yagi,et al.  Stochastic Transport of Runaway Electrons due to Low-order Perturbations in Tokamak Disruption , 2014 .

[6]  P. Vondracek,et al.  Post-disruptive runaway electron beams in the COMPASS tokamak , 2015, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[7]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  An ITPA joint experiment to study runaway electron generation and suppression , 2014 .

[8]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  Magnetic Control of Tokamak Plasmas , 2008 .

[9]  Jose Ramon Martin-Solis,et al.  Dynamics of high energy runaway electrons in the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade , 2003 .

[10]  Daniele Pucci,et al.  An overview of the software architecture of the plasma position, current and density realtime controller of the FTU , 2014 .

[11]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Status of research toward the ITER disruption mitigation system , 2015 .

[12]  P. D. Morgan,et al.  Disruption mitigation by massive gas injection in JET , 2011 .

[13]  A. Astolfi,et al.  A new extremum seeking technique and its application to maximize RF heating on FTU , 2009 .

[14]  Tünde Fülöp,et al.  Runaway electron drift orbits in magnetostatic perturbed fields , 2011 .

[15]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Control of post-disruption runaway electron beams in DIII-Da) , 2012 .

[16]  Mario Sassano,et al.  Performance-based controller switching: An application to plasma current control at FTU , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[17]  S. Bozhenkov,et al.  Suppression of runaway electrons by resonant magnetic perturbations in TEXTOR disruptions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[18]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  Experimental observation of increased threshold electric field for runaway generation due to synchrotron radiation losses in the FTU Tokamak. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[19]  Ftu,et al.  Inter-machine comparison of the termination phase and energy conversion in tokamak disruptions with runaway current plateau formation and implications for ITER , 2014 .

[20]  Daniele Pucci,et al.  MARTe at FTU: The new feedback control , 2012 .

[21]  E. Giovannozzi,et al.  Chapter 8: The Diagnostic Systems in the FTU , 2004 .

[22]  N. W. Eidietis,et al.  Disruptions in ITER and strategies for their control and mitigation , 2015 .

[23]  M. Landreman,et al.  Synchrotron radiation from runaway electron distributions in tokamaks , 2013, 1308.2099.

[24]  T. Fülöp,et al.  Runaway electron losses enhanced by resonant magnetic perturbations , 2011 .

[25]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Control and dissipation of runaway electron beams created during rapid shutdown experiments in DIII-D , 2013 .

[26]  J. Mlynář,et al.  Post-Disruptive Runaway Electron Beam in COMPASS Tokamak , 2015, 1503.02947.

[27]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Extremum seeking without external dithering and its application to plasma RF heating on FTU , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[28]  G. Granucci,et al.  Disruption control on FTU and ASDEX upgrade with ECRH , 2009 .

[29]  L. Zaccarian,et al.  First Steps in the FTU Migration Towards a Modular and Distributed Real-Time Control Architecture Based on MARTe , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[30]  Erwin Verwichte,et al.  Hot tail runaway electron generation in tokamak disruptions , 2008 .

[31]  J. A. Snipes,et al.  Conceptual Design of the ITER Plasma Control System , 2013 .

[32]  S. Podda,et al.  Improved calibration of the neutron yield measurement system on the FTU tokamak , 1992 .

[33]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A first approach to runaway electron control in FTU , 2013 .

[34]  D. Marocco,et al.  Real time n/γ discrimination for the JET neutron profile monitor , 2013 .

[35]  P. Buratti,et al.  Cherenkov emission provides detailed picture of non-thermal electron dynamics in the presence of magnetic islands , 2015 .

[36]  F. Belli,et al.  First results on runaway electron studies using the FTU neutron camera , 2015 .

[37]  Alessandro Astolfi,et al.  Adaptive hybrid observer of the plasma horizontal position at FTU , 2014, 22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.