A new Approach for GNSS Analysis in a Multi-GNSS and Multi-Signal Environment

A new Approach for GNSS Analysis in a Multi-GNSS and Multi-Signal Environment Over the coming years GPS and GLONASS will be modernised, whilst at the same time new systems like QZSS, Galileo, and Compass are launched. The modernisations of the existing and the deployment of new Global Naviagation Satellite Systems (GNSS) will make a whole range of new signals available to the users. The anticipated improvements will strongly depend on our understanding and handling of the biases that will inevitably exist between the different systems and signals. Furthermore the extremely high stability of the future satellite clocks means, that any form of differencing observations to cancel out the satellite clock offsets, effectively leads to a very significant loss of information. The fundamentally new aspect of our approach for GNSS analysis in a multi-GNSS and multi-signal environment is that it avoids the formation of differences as well as of linear combinations. Thus all available observations from all GNSS systems as observed by all the receivers in a network are incorporated in the parameter estimation. The fact that all observations are analysed without any pre-selection of observation types, needed for linear combinations or observation differences, leads to an enormous simplification of the processing.

[1]  Werner Gurtner,et al.  RINEX - The Receiver Independent Exchange Format - Version 3.00 , 2007 .

[2]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  On the precision and accuracy of IGS orbits , 2009 .

[3]  C. Bruyninx,et al.  On the link between GPS pseudorange noise and day-boundary discontinuities in geodetic time transfer solutions , 2007 .

[4]  Frank H. Webb,et al.  Characteristics and Applications of Precise GPS Clock Solutions Every 30 Seconds , 1997 .

[5]  Flavien Mercier,et al.  Zero-difference Integer Ambiguity Fixing on Single Frequency Receivers , 2009 .

[6]  C. Günther,et al.  Estimation of satellite and receiver biases on multiple Galileo frequencies with a Kalman filter , 2010 .

[7]  Paul Collins,et al.  Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution using the Decoupled Clock Model , 2008 .

[8]  G. Gendt,et al.  Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with daily observations , 2008 .

[9]  R. Eric Phelts Range Biases on Modernized GNSS Codes , 2007 .

[10]  J.-P. Berthias,et al.  Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and Its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination , 2007 .

[11]  Justine Spits,et al.  Total electron content monitoring using triple frequency GNSS data: A three-step approach , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas P. Yunck,et al.  Coping with the Atmosphere and Ionosphere in Precise Satellite and Ground Positioning , 2013 .

[13]  Ilaria Sesia,et al.  In-orbit performance assessment of GIOVE clocks , 2008 .

[14]  Lee A. Breakiron Proceedings of the 36th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Systems and Applications Meeting , 1999 .

[15]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Three's the challenge: A close look at GPS SVN62 triple-frequency signal combinations finds carrier-phase variations on the new L5 , 2010 .

[16]  P. J. De Jonge,et al.  A processing strategy for the application of the GPS in networks , 1998 .

[17]  G. Blewitt Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for the Global Positioning System Applied to Geodetic Baselines up to 2000 km , 1989 .

[18]  D. Odijk Fast precise GPS positioning in the presence of ionospheric delays , 2002 .

[19]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Characterization of GPS/GIOVE sensor stations in the CONGO network , 2011 .

[20]  Justine Spits,et al.  Total electron content monitoring using triple frequency GNSS: Results with Giove-A/-B data , 2011 .