Do perceived justice and need support of the coach predict team identification and cohesion? Testing their relative importance among top volleyball and handball players in Belgium and Norway

Objectives: Based on findings in organizational psychology, the aim of the present study was to test the relevance of perceived justice and need support of the coach in team sports. Specifically, two studies examined their relation with athletes’ team identification and team cohesion. Design: Two cross-sectional, questionnaire studies conducted after a midseason game day. Methods: In study 1, Belgian top level female volleyball players (N ¼56; M ¼22.33) and male handball players (N ¼35; M ¼23.59) completed web-based questionnaires assessing athletes’ perceived justice and need support of the coach and their team identification and cohesion. In study 2, Norwegian top level female handball players (N ¼110; M ¼22.8) filled in mail surveys assessing athletes’ perceived distributive and procedural justice of the coach and their team identification and cohesion. Results: Both studies used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the data. In line with our expectations both overall perceived justice and need support by the coach, positively predicted athletes’ team identification (p <.05). Study 2 demonstrated that procedural justice and not distributive justice predicts team identification (p<.05). In addition, team identification positively predicted athletes’ task and social cohesion (p<.001) and mediated the relation between procedural justice and both forms of cohesion. Conclusions: These findings clearly indicate the importance of both perceived justice and need support for top level team athletes from different cultural settings. Coach-related procedural justice in particular seems to be crucial for elite athletes’ team identification and cohesion.

[1]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination in a work organization. , 1989 .

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[3]  D. Cremer,et al.  How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. , 2002 .

[4]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Conceptualizing Social Identity: A New Framework and Evidence for the Impact of Different Dimensions , 1999 .

[5]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[6]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Introduction à la psychologie sociale , 1972 .

[7]  J. Colquitt.  On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  M. Pandelaere,et al.  When Your Team is Not Really Your Team Anymore: Identification with a Merged Basketball Club , 2008 .

[9]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[11]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Leadership and Satisfaction in Athletics , 1995 .

[12]  T. Horn,et al.  Advances in Sport Psychology , 2002 .

[13]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. , 1993 .

[14]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Sticking Together or Falling Apart: In-Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual Mobility , 1997 .

[15]  G. Latham,et al.  Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[17]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[18]  P. Chelladurai.  Leadership in sports: A review. , 1990 .

[19]  E. Deci,et al.  Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination , 2001 .

[20]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[21]  A. Carrón,et al.  Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. , 2002 .

[22]  Steve Williams,et al.  The Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Performance , 1999 .

[23]  D. Wann,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motives for Originally following a Sport Team and Team Identification , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  Supervisor Intervention with Troubled Workers: A Social Identity Perspective , 1997 .

[25]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[26]  Holly Arrow,et al.  A Tripartite Model of Group Identification , 1999 .

[27]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[28]  J. Prooijen.  Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation , 2009 .

[29]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[30]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[31]  H. Wilke,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Group Belongingness and Procedural Justice: Social Inclusion and Exclusion by Peers Affects the Psychology of Voice , 2004 .

[32]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. , 1993 .

[33]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Are Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Conceptually Distinct , 2005 .

[34]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Group dynamics in sport , 2005 .

[35]  S. Wuerth,et al.  Perceived leadership behaviour and motivational climate as antecedents of adolescent athletes skill development , 2005 .

[36]  I. Cockerill.  Solutions in Sport Psychology , 2002 .

[37]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement , 2000 .

[38]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  What is organizational justice? A historical overview. , 2005 .

[39]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? , 1987 .

[40]  Jean-Philippe Heuzé,et al.  Should the Coaches of Elite Female Handball Teams Focus on Collective Efficacy or Group Cohesion , 2007 .

[41]  E. Schaefer.  CHILDREN'S REPORTS OF PARENTAL BEHAVIOR: AN INVENTORY. , 1965, Child development.

[42]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  JUSTICE IN TEAMS: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE , 2002 .

[43]  D. Whaley,et al.  Team Cohesion, Effort, and Objective Individual Performance of High School Basketball Players , 2001 .

[44]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  T. Tyler,et al.  The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. , 1981 .

[46]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[47]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  How should organizational justice be measured , 2005 .

[48]  Tim Pitt,et al.  Physiology of Sport and Exercise , 2004 .

[49]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[50]  D. Anderson-Butcher,et al.  Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory , 2007 .

[51]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[52]  N. Ntoumanis,et al.  Dimensions of Coaching Behavior, Need Satisfaction, and the Psychological and Physical Welfare of Young Athletes , 2004 .

[53]  F. Reid.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[54]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  G. Holmbeck.  Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[56]  Jukka Lipponen,et al.  Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes , 2006 .

[57]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Justice , 2005 .

[58]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[59]  Joan L. Duda,et al.  Perceived motivational climate, need satisfaction and indices of well-being in team sports: A longitudinal perspective , 2006 .

[60]  Nikos Ntoumanis,et al.  Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory , 2008 .

[61]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the Factorial Validity, Replication, and Invariance of a Measuring Instrument: A Paradigmatic Application Based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. , 1994, Multivariate behavioral research.