The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.

[1]  Jeremy M Grimshaw,et al.  Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews? , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[2]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  D. Turpin.  CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  Alan Y Chiang,et al.  Book Review: Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd edition , 2005 .

[5]  T. Einarson,et al.  Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder , 2004, Current medical research and opinion.

[6]  P. Tugwell,et al.  A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[7]  E. Christensen.  Quality of reporting of meta-analyses: the QUOROM statement. Will it help? , 2001, Journal of hepatology.

[8]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement , 2000, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[9]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  C. Williams.  QUOROM--another step forwards. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  A R Jadad,et al.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[13]  A R Jadad,et al.  Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[16]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. , 2006, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  M. Tramèr.  CONSORT, QUOROM, and structured abstracts--new rules for authors, new tools for readers. , 2001, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[18]  D. Cook,et al.  Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.