Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1.

PURPOSE New complementary multilingual speech-in-noise tests in Russian, Turkish, and Spanish for hearing self-screening purposes and follow-up hearing diagnostics are compared to the speech tests of the European project, HearCom (Hearing in the Communication Society). METHOD The tests consist of spoken numbers (Digit Triplet Test; Smits, Kapteyn, & Houtgast, 2004) or sentences (Matrix Test; e.g., Hagerman, 1982) presented in a background noise and estimate the speech reception threshold, which is the signal-to-noise ratio that yields 50% speech intelligibility. All tests were developed according to the HearCom minimum quality standards for speech intelligibility tests. This report presents a cross-language comparison of reference speech intelligibility functions for monaural headphone measurements with normal-hearing listeners. The same model function was employed to describe the speech intelligibility functions for all of the tests. RESULTS Reference speech intelligibility functions of the new versions of the Digit Triplet Test and Matrix Test show high comparability to the HearCom tests. In order to achieve the highest possible comparability across languages, language- and speaker-dependent factors in speech intelligibility should be compensated for. CONCLUSION To date, several complementary tests for screening and diagnostics have been developed in several languages. Adhering to the HearCom standards, the tests are highly comparable across languages. For the Matrix Test, equal syntax and linguistic complexity were maintained across languages due to common methodological standards.

[1]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  K. Wagener,et al.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[5]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[6]  T. Houtgast,et al.  How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing–screening tests by telephone and internet , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[7]  Aleksander Sek,et al.  Development and evaluation of Polish digit triplet test for auditory screening , 2009, Speech Commun..

[8]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[9]  Heleen Luts,et al.  The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[10]  Rainer Martin,et al.  HearCom: hearing in the communication society , 2011 .

[11]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[12]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[13]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: The German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[14]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise , 2014, International journal of audiology.