Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Strategies for Achieving a High Response Rate in a Home Interview Survey

BackgroundResponse rates in surveys have been falling over the last 20 years, leading to the need for novel approaches to enhance recruitment. This study describes strategies used to maximise recruitment to a home interview survey of mothers with young children living in areas of high deprivation.MethodsMothers of two year old children received a letter from their GP inviting them to take part in a survey on diet. Participants were subsequently recruited by a researcher. The researcher first tried to contact potential participants by telephone, to discuss the study and make an appointment to conduct a home interview. Where telephone numbers for women could not be obtained from GP records, web searches of publicly available databases were conducted. After obtaining correct telephone numbers, up to six attempts were made to establish contact by telephone. If this was unsuccessful, a postal request for telephone contact was made. Where no telephone contact was achieved, the researcher sent up to two appointments by post to conduct a home interview.ResultsParticipating GPs invited 372 women to take part in a home based interview study. GP practices provided telephone numbers for 162 women, of which 134 were valid numbers. The researcher identified a further 187 numbers from electronic directories. Further searches of GP records by practice staff yielded another 38 telephone numbers. Thus, telephone numbers were obtained for 99% of potential participants.The recruitment rate from telephone contacts was 77%. Most of the gain was achieved within four calls. For the remaining women, contact by post and home visits resulted in 18 further interviews, corresponding to 35% of the women not recruited by telephone. The final interview rate was 82%. This was possible because personal contact was established with 95% of potential participants.ConclusionThis study achieved a high response rate in a hard to reach group. This was mainly achieved by first establishing contact by telephone. The use of multiple sources identified the telephone numbers of almost all the sample. Multiple attempts at telephone contact followed by postal approaches led to a high home interview rate.

[1]  Katharine G. Abraham,et al.  Non-Response in the American Time Use Survey: Who is Missing from the Data and How Much Does it Matter? , 2006 .

[2]  Andy Haines,et al.  Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  I Roberts,et al.  Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  Jonathan Burton,et al.  The long‐term effectiveness of refusal conversion procedures on longitudinal surveys , 2006 .

[5]  Alan M. Zaslavsky,et al.  Using Telephone Interviews to Reduce Nonresponse Bias to Mail Surveys of Health Plan Members , 2002, Medical care.

[6]  T. Johnson,et al.  Using Community-Level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey , 2006 .

[7]  David J Torgerson,et al.  Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[8]  T. Chey,et al.  Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial. , 1995, Journal of public health medicine.

[9]  Frank Sullivan,et al.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  G. Turrell,et al.  Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important? , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[12]  Thomas W. Smith Survey Non-Response Procedures in Cross-National Perspective: The 2005 ISSP Non-Response Survey , 2007 .

[13]  S. Bartholomae,et al.  The Recruitment of Normal Healthy Volunteers: A Review of The Literature on the Use of Financial Incentives , 2002, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[14]  Peter Lynn,et al.  Separating refusal bias and non-contact bias: evidence from UK national surveys , 2002 .

[15]  S. Leeder,et al.  Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door—to—door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study , 1977, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[16]  J. Siemiatycki,et al.  Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  S. Demarest,et al.  Survey error in measuring socio-economic risk factors of health status: a comparison of a survey and a census. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  S. Gates,et al.  Maximising response to postal questionnaires – A systematic review of randomised trials in health research , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[19]  Eleanor Singer,et al.  Introduction Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[20]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Factors Affecting Response Rates to the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study Survey , 2002, Medical care.

[21]  E McColl,et al.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[22]  Geert Loosveldt,et al.  Minimizing survey refusal and noncontact rates: do our efforts pay off? , 2007 .

[23]  P. Edwards,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[24]  P. Edwards,et al.  Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[25]  S. Brophy,et al.  Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  E. Singer NONRESPONSE BIAS IN HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS , 2006 .

[27]  W M Tierney,et al.  Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. , 1997, Medical care.