Systematic Review of Speech Generating Devices for Aphasia

The purpose of this chapter is to integrate and synthesize, using a meta-analytic approach, the research literature on the effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention using speech generating devices (SGDs) for people with aphasia. Many individuals with little or no functional speech as a result of severe aphasia rely on non-speech communication systems to augment or replace natural speech. These systems include SGDs and software programs that produce synthetic speech upon activation. Based on this quantitative review, the following conclusions are evident. The first is that the existing state of knowledge on whether AAC interventions using SGDs work for people with aphasia is seriously affected not only because of the lack of data but also because most of the available data are compromised because of serious internal validity concerns. Keeping in mind this first conclusion as a context, the second conclusion is that AAC intervention options that utilize SGDs seem to be effective in changing the dependent variables in the experimental contexts. However, the variability among dependent measures across studies and of results within and across studies precludes meta-analytic techniques. Thus, any statements as to the effectiveness of AAC interventions using SGDs for persons with aphasia cannot be made yet.

[1]  Michael Weinrich,et al.  The utility of computerized visual communication for improving natural language in chronic global aphasia: Implications for approaches to treatment in global aphasia , 2000 .

[2]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal , 2007 .

[3]  A. Rostron,et al.  Computerised augmentative communication devices for people with dysphasia: design and evaluation. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[4]  Marjorie Nicholas,et al.  Using a computer to communicate: Effect of executive function impairments in people with severe aphasia , 2005 .

[5]  M. Weinrich,et al.  Training Agrammatic Subjects on Passive Sentences: Implications for Syntactic Deficit Theories , 2001, Brain and Language.

[6]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics , 2008 .

[7]  Rajinder Koul,et al.  Identification and production of graphic symbols by individuals with aphasia: efficacy of a software application , 1998 .

[8]  Effects of synthetic speech output in the learning of graphic symbols of varied iconicity , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Michael Weinrich,et al.  Generalization from Single Sentence to Multisentence Production in Severely Aphasic Patients , 1997, Brain and Language.

[10]  W. Rosenberg,et al.  Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving , 1995, BMJ.

[11]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using personal and contextual pictures in a visual scene display prototype , 2007 .

[12]  Jiska Wiegers,et al.  A computerised communication aid for people with aphasia , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Roles of Speech Output in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Narrative Review , 2003, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[14]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[15]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Can People Who Have Aphasia Learn Iconic Codes , 1998 .

[16]  Rajinder Koul,et al.  Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a computer-based augmentative and alternative communication intervention , 2005, Brain and Language.

[17]  R. R. Robey A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice in Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2004 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.