Technologies of memory: Key issues and critical perspectives

Past, present and emerging technologies of memory are important concerns for memory studies. What is remembered individually and collectively depends in part on technologies of memory and socio-technical practices, which are changing radically. We identify specific concerns about developments in digital memory capture, storage and retrieval. Decisions are being made now that may have far-reaching consequences. Systems are being designed based on models and metaphors in which human memory works much like the computer. We bring to this discussion a critical perspective from science and technology studies (STS) and a grounding in human—computer interaction (HCI) and computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). We argue that, while these developments are significant for memory studies research, even more important is the need for memory studies to remind and inspire designers of what is possible and useful, and help expand the understanding of human memory on which these systems are based.

[1]  Wendy Hall,et al.  Memories for life: a review of the science and technology , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Henry Jenkins.  Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide , 2006 .

[3]  Jeffrey K. Olick.  'Collective memory': A memoir and prospect , 2008 .

[4]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[5]  Steve Mann,et al.  Continuous lifelong capture of personal experience with EyeTap , 2004, CARPE'04.

[6]  J. Wertsch,et al.  Creating a new discipline of memory studies , 2008 .

[7]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Alastair G. Smith.  Handbook for digital projects: a management tool for preservation and access , 2002 .

[9]  P. Connerton,et al.  Seven types of forgetting , 2008 .

[10]  Steve Mann.  CyborGLOGGER performance of globaleyesation , 2007, SIGGRAPH '07.

[11]  Marita Sturken.  Memory, consumerism and media: Reflections on the emergence of the field , 2008 .

[12]  Mike Wu,et al.  Collaborating to remember: a distributed cognition account of families coping with memory impairments , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Nancy A. Van House.  Distant Closeness: Cameraphones and Public Image Sharing , 2006 .

[14]  Karen E. Till.  Artistic and activist memory-work: Approaching place-based practice , 2008 .

[15]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Flickr and public image-sharing: distant closeness and photo exhibition , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Elizabeth F. Churchill.  Online and offline, together and apart: Sharing memories with digital video , 2002 .

[17]  J. Bühlmann,et al.  [Memories in life]. , 2010, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[18]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Rethinking Personal Digital Archiving, Part 1: Four Challenges from the Field , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[19]  Tony Salvador,et al.  Practical Considerations of Context for Context Based Systems: An Example from an Ethnographic Case Study of a Man Diagnosed with Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, UbiComp.

[20]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Rethinking Personal Digital Archiving, Part 2: Implications for Services, Applications, and Institutions , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[21]  David Bawden,et al.  Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2007 .

[22]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Science and technology studies and information studies , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Ps AND QsDesigning for digital archives , 2008, INTR.

[24]  E Matlin,et al.  I Remember , 2006 .

[25]  Sarita Albagli,et al.  Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2005 .

[26]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Bias in computer systems , 1996, TOIS.

[27]  Marc Davis,et al.  The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[28]  G. Bell,et al.  A digital life , 2007 .