Bayesian Networks and Infrastructure Systems: Computational and Methodological Challenges

This chapter investigates the applicability of Bayesian Network methods to the seismic assessment of large and complex infrastructure systems. While very promising in theory, Bayesian Networks tend to quickly show limitations as soon as the studied systems exceed several dozens of components. Therefore a benchmark study is conducted on small-size virtual systems in order to compare the computational performance of the exact inference of various Bayesian Network formulations, such as the ones based on Minimum Link Sets. It appears that all formulations present some computational bottlenecks, which are either due to the size of Conditional Probability Tables, to the size of clique potentials in the junction-tree algorithm or to the recursive algorithm for the identification of Minimum Link Sets. Moreover, these formulations are limited to connectivity problems, whereas the accurate assessment of infrastructure systems usually requires the use of flow-based performance indicators. To this end, the second part of the chapter introduces a hybrid approach that presents the merit of accessing any type of system performance indicator: it uses simulation-based results and generates the corresponding Bayesian Network by counting the outcomes given the various combinations of events that have been sampled in the simulation. The issue of the system size is also addressed by a thrifty-naive formulation, which limits the number of the components that are involved in the system performance prediction, by applying a cut-off threshold to the correlation coefficients between the components and system states. A higher resolution of this thrifty-naive formulation is also obtained by considering local performance indicators, such as the flow at each sink. This approach is successfully applied to a realistic water supply network of 49 nodes and 71 pipes. Finally the potential of this coupled simulation-Bayesian approach as a decision support system is demonstrated, through probability updating given the observation of local evidences after an event has occurred.

[1]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Seismic vulnerability analysis of a complex interconnected civil Infrastructure , 2013 .

[2]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  I. Vanzi,et al.  Seismic reliability of electric power transmission systems , 1995 .

[4]  Eugenio Gutiérrez,et al.  Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: The case of European gas and electricity networks , 2012 .

[5]  Bozidar Stojadinovic,et al.  A Framework for Linking Community-Resilience Goals to Specific Performance Targets for the Built Environment , 2015 .

[6]  Ned H. C. Hwang,et al.  Fundamentals of Hydraulic Engineering Systems , 1987 .

[7]  Abraham Lempel,et al.  A universal algorithm for sequential data compression , 1977, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Framework for Post-Earthquake Risk Assessment and Decision Making for Infrastructure Systems , 2015 .

[9]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  A stochastic framework to model deterioration in engineering systems , 2015 .

[10]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Interdependent Response of Networked Systems to Natural Hazards and Intentional Disruptions , 2005 .

[11]  Michelle Terese Bensi,et al.  A Bayesian Network Methodology for Infrastructure Seismic Risk Assessment and Decision Support , 2010 .

[12]  C. Dunnett,et al.  Approximations to the probability integral and certain percentage points of a multivariate analogue of Student's t-distribution* , 1955 .

[13]  Jose Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez,et al.  A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Probabilistic Assessment of Civil Infrastructure Resilience to Earthquakes , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[15]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Efficient Bayesian network modeling of systems , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Renewal theory-based life-cycle analysis of deteriorating engineering systems , 2014 .

[17]  Simona Esposito,et al.  Framework for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Spatially Distributed Systems , 2014 .

[18]  Hirokazu Tatano,et al.  Estimation of Lifeline Resilience Factors Based on Surveys of Japanese Industries , 2009 .

[19]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Bayes net toolbox for Matlab , 1999 .

[20]  P. Gardoni,et al.  Effect of seismic degradation on the fragility of reinforced concrete bridges , 2014 .

[21]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Physical infrastructure interdependency and regional resilience index after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake in Japan , 2014 .