Differences in Regional Brain Volumes Two Months and One Year after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Conventional structural imaging is often normal after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is a need for structural neuroimaging biomarkers that facilitate detection of milder injuries, allow recovery trajectory monitoring, and identify those at risk for poor functional outcome and disability. We present a novel approach to quantifying volumes of candidate brain regions at risk for injury. Compared to controls, patients with mTBI had significantly smaller volumes in several regions including the caudate, putamen, and thalamus when assessed 2 months after injury. These differences persisted but were reduced in magnitude 1 year after injury, suggesting the possibility of normalization over time in the affected regions. More pronounced differences, however, were found in the amygdala and hippocampus, suggesting the possibility of regionally specific responses to injury.

[1]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Manual Annotation, 3-D Shape Reconstruction, and Traumatic Brain Injury Analysis , 2011, MBIA.

[2]  Irina Wächter-Stehle,et al.  Shape-Constrained Deformable Models and Applications in Medical Imaging , 2014 .

[3]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Mayer,et al.  A prospective study of gray matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury , 2013, Neurology.

[5]  Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,et al.  Major depression following traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Archives of general psychiatry.

[6]  Jan M. Seabaugh,et al.  Progressive brain atrophy in patients with chronic neuropsychiatric symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study , 2012, Brain injury.

[7]  T. Dóczi,et al.  Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging in the acute and sub-acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury: can we see the difference? , 2013, Journal of neurotrauma.

[8]  Olivier Ecabert,et al.  Automatic Model-Based Segmentation of the Heart in CT Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Yulin Ge,et al.  Mild traumatic brain injury: longitudinal regional brain volume changes. , 2013, Radiology.

[10]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  An evaluation of four automatic methods of segmenting the subcortical structures in the brain , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. LingJosef,et al.  Gray matter abnormalities in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. , 2015 .

[12]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Shape Constrained Deformable Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation , 2001, IPMI.

[13]  James S Babb,et al.  Brain atrophy in mild or moderate traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal quantitative analysis. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  James C. Ford,et al.  Effect of head impacts on diffusivity measures in a cohort of collegiate contact sport athletes , 2014, Neurology.

[15]  Nancy C. Andreasen,et al.  Problems with ratio and proportion measures of imaged cerebral structures , 1991, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[16]  E. Bigler Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) , 2013, Neuropsychology Review.

[17]  T. Mcintosh Neurochemical sequelae of traumatic brain injury: therapeutic implications. , 1994, Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews.

[18]  D. Graham,et al.  Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: a 15-year review and evaluation. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[19]  Andrew R Mayer,et al.  Gray Matter Abnormalities in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2015 .

[20]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using a Shape-Constrained Deformable Model , 2011, MBIA.