Research Assessment and Bibliometrics: Bringing Quality Back In
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Giménez-Toledo,et al. From experimentation to coordination in the evaluation of Spanish scientific journals in the humanities and social sciences , 2007 .
[2] P. Lawrence. Rank injustice , 2002, Nature.
[3] Edward Towpik,et al. Sand Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) , 2013 .
[4] M. Khoury,et al. Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[5] G. Bodenhausen,et al. Bibliometrics as weapons of mass citation. , 2010, Chimia.
[6] Sven E. Hug,et al. Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history , 2013 .
[7] J. Lane. Let's make science metrics more scientific , 2010, Nature.
[8] Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al. Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities , 2012 .
[9] Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al. Indicators for Research Quality in the Humanities: Opportunities and Limitations , 2012 .
[10] Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al. A Framework to Explore and Develop Criteria for Assessing Research Quality in the Humanities , 2012 .
[11] L. Butler,et al. Assessing university research: A plea for a balanced approach , 2007 .
[12] P. Lawrence. The politics of publication , 2003, Nature.
[13] R. Cagan. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.
[14] G. Bodenhausen,et al. Bibliometrics as Weapons of Mass Citation - La bibliométrie comme arme de citation massive , 2010 .