Mapping 3D breast lesions from full-field digital mammograms using subject-specific finite element models

Patient-specific finite element (FE) models of the breast have received increasing attention due to the potential capability of fusing images from different modalities. During the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to X-ray mammography registration procedure, the FE model is compressed mimicking the mammographic acquisition. Subsequently, suspicious lesions in the MRI volume can be projected into the 2D mammographic space. However, most registration algorithms do not provide the reverse information, avoiding to obtain the 3D geometrical information from the lesions localized in the mammograms. In this work we introduce a fast method to localize the 3D position of the lesion within the MRI, using both cranio-caudal (CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO) mammographic projections, indexing the tetrahedral elements of the biomechanical model by means of an uniform grid. For each marked lesion in the Full-Field Digital Mammogram (FFDM), the X-ray path from source to the marker is calculated. Barycentric coordinates are computed in the tetrahedrons traversed by the ray. The list of elements and coordinates allows to localize two curves within the MRI and the closest point between both curves is taken as the 3D position of the lesion. The registration errors obtained in the mammographic space are 9.89 ± 3.72 mm in CC- and 8.04 ± 4.68 mm in MLO-projection and the error in the 3D MRI space is equal to 10.29 ± 3.99 mm. Regarding the uniform grid, it is computed spending between 0.1 and 0.7 seconds. The average time spent to compute the 3D location of a lesion is about 8 ms.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Full-Field Digital Mammograms: A Validation Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  M. J. Rupérez,et al.  A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images. , 2014, Medical physics.

[3]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  NiftySim: A GPU-based nonlinear finite element package for simulation of soft tissue biomechanics , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[4]  Lianghao Han,et al.  Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Dmitry B. Goldgof,et al.  Correspondence recovery in 2-view mammography , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[6]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[7]  K. Miller,et al.  Total Lagrangian explicit dynamics finite element algorithm for computing soft tissue deformation , 2006 .

[8]  Ares Lagae,et al.  Compact, Fast and Robust Grids for Ray Tracing , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[9]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  Dmitry B. Goldgof,et al.  Towards registration of temporal mammograms by finite element simulation of MR breast volumes , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  SiHang TetGen, a Delaunay-Based Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator , 2015 .

[12]  Torsten Hopp,et al.  2D/3D Registration for Localization of Mammographically Depicted Lesions in Breast MRI , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  MRI to X-ray mammography intensity-based registration with simultaneous optimisation of pose and biomechanical transformation parameters , 2014, Medical Image Anal..